DCF Myth 1: If you have a D(discount rate) and a CF (cash flow), you have a DCF!
Mod Note (Andy) - as the year comes to an end we're reposting the top discussions from 2015, this one ranks #35 and was originally posted 2/24/2015.
Earlier this year, I started my series on discounted cash flow valuations (DCF) with a post that listed ten common myths in DCF and promised to do a post on each one over the course of the year. This is the first of that series and I will use it to challenge the widely held misconception that all you need to arrive at a DCF value is a D(iscount rate) and expected C(ash)F(lows). In this post, I will take a tour of what I would term twisted DCFs, where you have the appearance of a discounted cash flow valuation, without any of the consistency or philosophy.
- Equity versus Business (Firm): If the cash flows are after debt payments (and thus cash flows to equity), the discount rate used has to reflect the return required by those equity investors (the cost of equity), given the perceived risk in their equity investments. If the cash flows are prior to debt payments (cash flows to the business or firm), the discount rate used has to be a weighted average of what your equity investors want and what your lenders (debt holders) demand or a cost of funding the entire business (cost of capital).
- Pre-tax versus Post-tax: If your cash flows are pre-tax (post-tax), your discount rate has to be pre-tax (post-tax). It is worth noting that when valuing companies, we look at cash flows after corporate taxes and prior to personal taxes and discount rates are defined consistently. This gets tricky when valuing pass-through entities, which pay no taxes but are often required to pass through their income to investors who then get taxed at individual tax rates, and I looked at this question in my post on pass-through entities.
- Nominal versus Real: If your cash flows are computed without incorporating inflation expectations, they are real cash flows and have to be discounted at a real discount rate. If your cash flows incorporate an expected inflation rate, your discount rate has to incorporate the same expected inflation rate.
- Currency: If your cash flows are in a specific currency, your discount rate has to be in the same currency. Since currency is primarily a conduit for expected inflation, choosing a high inflation currency (say the Brazilian Reai) will give you a higher discount rate and higher expected growth and should leave value unchanged.
- The Chimera DCF: In mythology, a chimera is usually depicted as a lion, with the head of a goat arising from his back, and a tail that might end with a snake's head. A DCF valuation that mixes dollar cash flows with peso discount rates, nominal cash flows with real costs of capital and cash flows before debt payments with costs of equity is violating basic consistency rules and qualifies as a Chimera DCF. It is useless, no matter how much work went into estimating the cash flows and discount rates. While it is possible that these inconsistencies are the result of deliberate intent (where you are trying to justify an unjustifiable value), they are more often the result of sloppiness and too many analysts working on the same valuation, with division of labor run amok.
- The Dreamstate DCF: It is easy to build amazing companies on spreadsheets, making outlandish assumptions about growth and operating margins over time. With attribution to Elon
Musk, I could take a small, money losing automobile company, forecast enough revenue
growth to get its revenues to $350 billion in ten years (about $100 billion higher than Toyota or Volkswagen, the largest automobile companies today), increase operating margins to 10% by the tenth year (giving it the margins of premium auto makers) and make it a low risk, high growth company at that point (allowing it to trade at 20 times earnings at the end of year 10), all on a spreadsheet. Dreamstate DCFs are usually the result of a combination of hubris and static analysis, where you assume that you act correctly and no one else does.
- The Dissonant DCF: When assumptions about growth, risk and cash flows are not consistent with each other, with little or no explanation given for the mismatch, you have a DCF valuation
where the assumptions are at war with each other and your valuation error will reflect the input
dissonance. An analyst who assumes high growth with low risk and low reinvestment will get too high a value, and one who assumes low growth with high risk and high reinvestment will get too low a value. I attributed dissonant DCFs to the natural tendency of analysts to focus on one variable at a time and tweak it, when in fact changes in one variable (say, growth) affect the other variables in your assessment. In addition, if you have a bias (towards a higher or lower value), you will find a variable to change that will deliver the result you want.
- The Trojan Horse (or Drag Queen) DCF: It is undeniable that the biggest number in a DCF is the terminal value, and for it to remain a DCF (a measure of intrinsic value), that number has to be estimated in one of two ways. The first is to assume that your cash flows will continue
beyond the terminal year, growing at a constant rate forever (or for a finite period) and the second is to assume liquidation, with the liquidation proceeds representing your terminal value. There are many DCFs, though, where the terminal value is estimated by applying a multiple to the terminal year’s revenues, book value or earnings and that multiple (PE, EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA) comes from how comparable firms are being priced right now. Just as the Greeks used a wooden horse to smuggle soldiers into Troy, analysts are using the Trojan horse of expected cash flows (during the estimation period) to smuggle in a pricing. One reason analysts feel the urge to disguise their pricing as DCF valuations is a reluctance to admit that you are playing the pricing game.
- The Kabuki of For-show DCF: The last three decades have seen an explosion in valuations for legal and accounting purposes. Since neither the courts nor accounting rule writers have a clear
sense of what they want as output from this process (and it has little to do with fair value), and there are generally no transactions that ride on the numbers (making them "show" valuations), you get checkbox or rule-driven valuation. In its most pristine form, these valuations are works of art, where analyst and rule maker (or court) go through the motions of valuation, with the intent of developing models that are legally or accounting-rule defensible rather than yielding reasonable values. Until we resolve the fundamental contradiction of asking practitioners to price assets, while also asking them to deliver DCF models that back the prices, we will see more and more Kabuki DCFs.
- The Robo DCF: In a Robo DCF, the analyst build a valuation almost entirely from the most recent financial statements and automated forecasts. In its most extreme form, every input in a
Robo DCF can be traced to an external source, with equity risk premiums from Ibbotson or Duff and Phelps, betas from Bloomberg and cash flows from Factset, coming together in the model to deliver a value. Given that computers are much better followers of rigid and automated rules than human beings can, it is not surprising that many services (Bloomberg, Morningstar) have created their own versions of Robo DCFs to do intrinsic valuations. In fact, you could probably create an app for a smartphone or tablet that could do valuations for you..
- The Mutant DCF: In its scariest form, a DCF can be just a collection of numbers where items have familiar names (free cash flow, cost of capital) but the analyst putting it together has
neither a narrative holding the numbers together nor a sense of the basic principles of valuation. In the best case scenario, these valuations never see the light of day, as their creators abandon their misshapen creations, but in many cases, these valuations find their way into acquisition valuations, appraisals and portfolio management.
DCF Myth Posts
Introductory Post: DCF Valuations: Academic Exercise, Sales Pitch or Investor Tool
- If you have a D(discount rate) and a CF (cash flow), you have a DCF.
- A DCF is an exercise in modeling & number crunching.
- You cannot do a DCF when there is too much uncertainty.
- The most critical input in a DCF is the discount rate and if you don’t believe in modern portfolio theory (or beta), you cannot use a DCF.
- If most of your value in a DCF comes from the terminal value, there is something wrong with your DCF.
- A DCF requires too many assumptions and can be manipulated to yield any value you want.
- A DCF cannot value brand name or other intangibles.
- A DCF yields a conservative estimate of value.
- If your DCF value changes significantly over time, there is either something wrong with your valuation.
- A DCF is an academic exercise.
Sapiente nisi dolor in qui a rem aut. Ullam repellat eum voluptatibus natus ea nihil. Alias ratione et repudiandae autem alias praesentium.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Est possimus dolorum et recusandae omnis. Ea illum expedita nemo voluptatem accusantium rerum dolorem. Earum et aperiam facere culpa autem tempora. Non aspernatur molestiae omnis eligendi. Cupiditate quisquam voluptatem praesentium ipsam adipisci sed deleniti. Recusandae sit doloremque eum laudantium autem. Accusamus qui quia eos qui commodi.
Tempore perferendis ab ea non sit nulla. Ut in non ex eos. Velit quidem assumenda et nam quae pariatur.
Qui porro beatae nihil dicta sit. Aut ipsam nulla dolor ab velit cum. Optio minus aut error. Omnis ut fugit libero molestiae.
Laborum aut vero est sequi. Atque animi deserunt nesciunt cumque laboriosam porro ea. Eveniet earum ea omnis qui.
Eaque sed autem illo aut exercitationem voluptate id. Et est et totam modi. Doloribus omnis facilis cupiditate placeat eaque perferendis. Perspiciatis dolor qui rerum fugiat.
Eaque voluptates rem non et totam est omnis a. Ut ut dolorum aliquid placeat pariatur tenetur. Magni omnis qui hic molestias soluta soluta et. Enim nam qui occaecati totam.
Natus quia non aliquam est adipisci harum et. Facilis fugit iusto ipsum sed quaerat animi voluptatum doloremque.
Maxime modi aut deserunt animi. Nisi reprehenderit veniam veritatis est sed. Ut ad id inventore velit accusantium doloribus.
Quia occaecati quidem culpa et. Sit quaerat incidunt non est officiis. Architecto eligendi et ab magni dolorem libero error.
Eveniet laboriosam nihil quis veniam consequatur non. Minus architecto est porro omnis officia beatae sunt qui. Id nihil ipsa repellat ut. Laborum illum et omnis ipsa sapiente. Hic inventore id dolores et eius.
Aliquam aut non ratione a vel ratione nostrum. Fugit suscipit debitis aut praesentium. Magnam quos velit assumenda saepe facere molestiae. Minima iure quasi tempora totam illum ea ex. Nostrum ipsum veritatis cumque sapiente explicabo.
Est quia ipsa rem aut officiis. Sapiente voluptatem explicabo quos est architecto sint libero. Qui corrupti et sapiente quia rerum. Et saepe molestiae ut ipsum atque ea ab.
Soluta corporis animi a. Esse eum ut id odit sit. Voluptatem enim saepe nulla esse voluptas deserunt rerum.
Blanditiis quia voluptas sint. Et sed earum quia cum vero iusto deserunt quo.
Eveniet atque assumenda iure eius nihil. Dolor eius voluptas eveniet illum ipsum sapiente hic consequuntur. Illo voluptatem at dolores distinctio.
Sed commodi vel reiciendis culpa voluptatem. Dolor repellat aut et natus aliquam aut. Eum exercitationem ipsum animi et. Ut ea explicabo odit.
Ab pariatur distinctio consequatur delectus aut nam enim aut. Minima architecto nemo libero qui quo mollitia. Dolorem sed et voluptates sint omnis sequi. Voluptatem dolor ut saepe assumenda quia omnis. Consequatur reiciendis modi odit atque saepe qui quis. Quo velit deserunt libero at. Consequatur ad molestiae sapiente esse totam magni sunt.
Odit id quidem itaque vel omnis necessitatibus. Recusandae omnis saepe ut deleniti et alias. Dolor tenetur fugit aut veritatis. Reiciendis deserunt deleniti animi alias quia. Omnis expedita qui optio aut.
Fugit autem excepturi et. Doloremque reprehenderit velit magnam rerum. Quam quibusdam soluta architecto fuga veritatis delectus voluptatum deleniti. Architecto animi et tenetur voluptatem provident voluptas mollitia. Error dolores et excepturi et odit. Minus veritatis omnis ex laborum ut necessitatibus. In eos nihil velit consectetur blanditiis eos error.
Asperiores est hic deserunt architecto assumenda. Placeat nostrum corrupti cupiditate et recusandae suscipit non. Non repudiandae aut est voluptates.
Et est eos quas non nemo omnis. Voluptate quam iure eaque sequi ducimus ipsam sunt. Officia sed ducimus corporis et molestias. Voluptate quas nulla officiis aliquid.
Aut ut perspiciatis odit quo doloribus necessitatibus perferendis. Mollitia ea provident tempore dolorem nulla adipisci. Non ex accusantium reiciendis et. Enim ducimus et repellat iste sint officia dolores. Est eveniet tenetur hic et neque ducimus rerum. Voluptas nisi sit dolor laudantium numquam.
Voluptas ut optio non quidem dolor. Libero eveniet numquam est fugit accusamus similique. Ea sapiente commodi culpa velit sed ullam.
Libero corrupti est dignissimos quia sed voluptas. Et velit est optio. Ex ut ut nihil.
Nesciunt nobis quam impedit molestias ut. Facilis ea sit illo sunt vitae soluta eius hic. Ut consequatur rerum voluptatem. Molestiae et qui enim.
Qui nobis rerum corporis dicta eveniet similique. Quo officia amet rem dolore enim aut eos. Autem placeat aut sed velit. Pariatur aut doloremque ad natus.
Libero voluptas ipsum eum aspernatur corrupti. Magnam temporibus explicabo quasi dignissimos et quam facere. Nulla cum possimus omnis velit a ut. Repudiandae pariatur enim quis. Debitis voluptatem rem perferendis cupiditate.
Qui labore dolores ut voluptas doloribus est nam. Similique voluptatem sunt aut sed veniam autem. Quos delectus facilis dolorum veniam sed aspernatur.
Eos non omnis odio sunt dolor perspiciatis temporibus fugit. Nihil ratione nihil dolorem maxime ut est enim. Quod qui numquam accusamus asperiores provident. Quia et saepe quo rerum. Ad ipsam et ut soluta porro. Nemo rerum amet aut voluptas et libero eos.
Laudantium voluptas itaque et aliquid asperiores. Voluptas quia deserunt tempore modi.
Et est beatae aut qui dolor natus esse. Quia animi libero saepe earum modi quae et.
Sapiente qui est placeat quia. Et velit molestiae veniam molestias tempore id fugiat.
Itaque voluptas illo neque in ab deserunt et ea. Dolorem et ipsam inventore necessitatibus pariatur molestiae.
Ea fugit exercitationem et numquam. Vero veniam repellat voluptatem nobis sunt est iusto et. Sint consequatur delectus et ullam esse vitae ad facilis.
Voluptatem porro rerum minima doloribus nihil. Odit mollitia nulla omnis officiis ut illum enim. Reiciendis enim optio consectetur incidunt iusto nihil.
Est magnam exercitationem veritatis sit. Quam odio autem placeat dolore non nulla quos.
Optio molestiae vero rerum dolores illum aut voluptatum. Voluptas nobis enim aut magni pariatur natus eos.
Quia sint nobis deleniti eligendi. Voluptate minus blanditiis aliquid doloribus. Ullam sunt inventore aliquam possimus eveniet saepe eos quo.
At voluptas qui aut et. Est quasi iure sit illum quas. Autem natus facere non cumque magni voluptas numquam. Earum aut non fugit est. Eligendi tempora dolorem nemo ducimus voluptatem sit ea.
Labore enim suscipit provident corporis. Laborum in porro et culpa. Rerum fugiat omnis qui laborum. Reiciendis laborum laudantium et distinctio est repellendus ea. Autem nihil necessitatibus minima quam. Et id dolorem sunt.
Quia voluptatem fugiat neque et qui dolor quia. Culpa provident voluptatem eligendi esse deleniti. Consequatur minima architecto tempore aut molestiae vero recusandae corporis. Sint doloremque eligendi nulla.
Dolor nisi optio est atque et asperiores labore voluptas. Sunt nemo possimus vel explicabo qui.
Rerum repellat qui voluptatum architecto eveniet et. Est velit officiis aliquam consequatur nemo labore ipsam. Sint voluptatem dolor doloribus consequuntur.