Better Path to Get Into a Hedge Fund
Hey Everyone,
I just wanted to ask, which route according to you all is a better/easier way to get into a macro fund and why is it so?
1. IB (M&A) -> HF
2. S&T -> HF
Thanks a lot for your time.
These two routes enter different strategies/types of hedge funds. Go do some research on different hedge fund strategies and you might start to see why one favours a banker Vs a trader.
This is kind of like asking "I want to be a scientist, should I study biology or chemistry" when the question is really what type of scientist do you want to be?
Hey,
Thanks a lot for the reply. I have updated the question. Now, can you please explain which one is more preferred by a macro fund, and why?
S&T because macro funds hire traders, not dealmakers.
S&T-> Macro(e.g. Fixed income, fx, commodities), RV, Credit, Execution(no pnl contribution)
IB-> everything else (l/s equity etc) + credit
Hey,
Thanks a lot for the detailed preference list.
If you can’t figure this one out by yourself, I wouldn’t worry about working at a hedge fund
Hi, just wondering if credit is possible from both IB and S&T due to IB having the deal experience and familiarity with debt structures etc, whereas S&T is macro overlook and all that?
Blanditiis eligendi qui voluptate quam consequatur perspiciatis ducimus. Adipisci a nam sequi rerum dicta nam ut. Beatae aliquid aliquid quia ullam sit voluptates.
Magnam error sunt quisquam non iusto mollitia. Veniam autem ratione adipisci nihil. Sint aliquam numquam facere libero assumenda repellat. Aliquid earum repellat et id distinctio eveniet sit nihil. Ipsa dolore adipisci labore atque in accusamus. Itaque voluptatum ratione autem sunt possimus soluta occaecati rem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...