17 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Bc in a bull market only the shittiest companies have debt trading at 80 or below. It's part of the reason that when funds do perform well in distressed, it is because they all had exposure to a small handful of names (e.g., Echostar). Plus, if you're not part of the 51% (because your fund is not willing to get big enough in a certain security/loan), you're likely to get hosed. It'll be interesting to see what happens with so many otherwise performing credits that have recently been sold off bc of the "AI renders software co terminal values to 0" trade. 

 

Research Associate in AM - FI

Bc in a bull market only the shittiest companies have debt trading 80. It's part of the reason that when funds do perform well in distressed, it is because they all had exposure to a small handful of names (e.g., Echostar). Plus, if you're not part of the 51% (because your fund is not willing to get big enough in a certain security/loan), you're likely to get hosed. It'll be interesting to see what happens with so many otherwise performing credits that have recently been sold off bc of the "AI renders software co terminal values to 0" trade. 

Thanks! Super helpful! How about distressed funds  that want to shift from public to private credit and no longer want to take big exposure in trades loans? Would it be harder to generate pnl?

 

i don't understand. if you're doing direct lending your aggregate exposure to each borrower is likely higher. i don't work in private credit, but i think pnl not the best phrasing for that world since your assets are not marked to market and you're mostly just trying to mitigate a blowup that could drag down the return of your portfolio. 

 

Not true in the slightest unless you limited distressed to be exclusively “buy mid market bank loans and try to gain control of business”.

Distress returns for anyone with a broader strategy are well correlated with CCC bonds and high yield more broadly. Both indices have ripped and guys have generally done well as most funds run much higher net vs equity peers.

The “broader strategy” is usually come combo of stressed performing credit, equities in sectors that have a big credit angle to them, converts, levered public equities, etc.

Sats, Altice France, etc have all been huge recent winners for distressed funds, and for the broader mandate guys XAI has been huge winner just this week. 

 

No one is looking at returns on a yield basis (your S+1700 comment) 


Most things have convexity through the level you’re entering the debt, ie return to event plus the coupon you pick up along the way 


To answer your question. most fund will be targeting mid-teens+ but individual positions could easily be >20% 


But once you blend the whole book which will typically also include carry type performing positions (amongst many others) you’ll get to the magical mid-teens figure 

 

you could get a safer mid-teen returns engineering unitranche loans with leverage at both investment and structure level, sot not sure how convincing is for LPs mid-teens for a higher risk strategy lol

incentives trumph ethics
 

Labore facere ipsam voluptatem quis. Aut voluptatibus nisi voluptas nihil dolorum doloremque. Eveniet recusandae labore blanditiis voluptatem consectetur vero. Et possimus ad accusamus est non et.

Tempora qui consequatur consequuntur. Pariatur dolorem et eaque laborum expedita. Non perspiciatis maxime quibusdam quia eum ut corporis culpa. Expedita soluta corrupti voluptatem aut praesentium.

Molestiae est deleniti quos ad impedit. Ea nihil voluptate quis dolor corrupti. Delectus sed aut et. Voluptas et eaque ullam omnis repellat quis. Qui soluta sunt ex minus sed voluptatem. Quibusdam reprehenderit fugiat qui magnam rerum.

Unde alias rerum reprehenderit itaque. Rerum ad repellat officiis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”