Accept Lazard M&A or A&M RX?
Hey all, recently got extended offers to both LAZ M&A and Alvarez and Marsal's RX (both in T1 cities), and am debating which offer to pick. Decided to create an acc. and browse on here before posting, but saw a bunch of posts talking about Lazard going downhill, so just wanted to be sure. Does that still apply, or is it an outdated POV?
I've also talked to a bunch of ppl (on the buyside and in IB), and responses have been mixed, so am looking for a tiebreak.
If anyone's got any insights would love to hear them.
What do you want to do in the long run?
Two main exits I see myself in 1) C-suite 2) Buyside (ambivalent between trad or distressed PE). So, I guess a follow up question would be what outcome is more likely: Taking the Laz offer and breaking into a good PE firm or taking the A&M offer and getting into a C-suite (CFO / CRO / COO / CEO) role at a good firm?
Others have said it but I agree that you should definitely take the Lazard offer. The opportunity gives you the most range in terms of exit opportunities, and its a better brand name regardless. If you wanted to go to distressed credit/PE, you should have RX advisory expeirence at a PJT/HL etc
If you are looking to do investment banking, Lazard is the much better option. Lazard is a world renowned investment bank with an incredible M&A franchise. They also do very well in the restructuring space (though, note your post says M&A group). I wouldn't get too caught up in day-to-day posts, Lazard remains a very highly respected place to work and incredible experience out of college with great buyside positioning. A&M is a consulting firm with a strong restructuring franchise, but fundamentally it is not an investment bank. If you want that type of restructuring consulting experience, I wouldn't steer someone away from A&M, but if you are looking for the more traditional finance route, go with Lazard.
Yeah that makes sense, but I feel like I'm more focused on the exits from both. Do you have any insight on what each would position me better for?
If you're looking to do a buyside role, Lazard M&A is going to carry the most weight.
From the consulting perspective are you open to traveling 80% of the year? Not sure what travel is like in IBD but this could sway you.
Traveling economy**
Sit nostrum inventore nihil eligendi et nulla velit. Libero architecto non id quia voluptatem. Cum ut error veritatis eaque et quo. Et modi voluptates voluptas tenetur nulla. Commodi ratione rerum alias.
Perspiciatis cupiditate in voluptatum est quis velit. Adipisci ducimus quis dolores numquam suscipit fugit atque cum. Autem rem unde culpa sint officiis amet expedita.
Ut quia quae temporibus quos. Cupiditate qui sed molestiae repellendus et. Earum et neque repellat qui. Libero quae rerum minus rem. Quo veniam repudiandae rem quos minus similique. Eaque debitis deserunt est debitis omnis quaerat omnis rerum.
Velit quia iure magni rerum impedit repellat. Rerum iusto molestiae vel libero occaecati sit. Vel odit esse voluptas molestiae hic natus eum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...