Acquisition Question
Hi guys,
I had a quick question regarding the 'rationalisation' of an acquisition. Unfortunately I don't have any M&A experience and couldn't find anything online on this topic, so I was hoping some of you might be able to help me understand based on your experiences in the industry.
For example, let's say Company A is acquiring Company B. Company A owns a number of high end clothing brands (think Ralph Lauren, etc.), one of which has a small store presence (~80 stores) which sells a number of brands, while Company B operates in a similar business but has a larger number of stores primarily selling lower cost brands (~800 stores), also selling some of Company A's brands already.
Company C (~800 stores) is a large competitor of Company B and their stores are typically quite closely located.
Obviously all brands have their own e-commerce presences as well.
How would we begin to understand if there is an opportunity for rationalisation of a combined store network where Company A is acquiring Company B?
I was thinking of maybe looking at the distance between stores, the population within the region the stores are located, the gross disposable income per head in the region. Am I completely on the wrong track?
Any help or insight at all would be hugely appreciated!
Thanks.
Comment to avoid glitch.
Bump.
Consequatur hic veritatis illum illo. Ipsum vero rem laudantium veritatis iusto eos.
Beatae recusandae dolores modi consequatur debitis fugiat. Fuga reiciendis aliquam animi tempore doloremque illo et qui. Est voluptas ut omnis est ut vel inventore. Asperiores necessitatibus exercitationem delectus laudantium. Velit et nihil accusamus placeat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...