Analyst/Associate Difference Between Banks
Is there actually any big difference in terms of quality between an analyst from a top group at a good bank versus someone from a not-so-good group at a mediocre bank or from a middle-market bank?
I'm curious how this translates to first-year associates. Are the ones from the good groups/banks better performers initially? I can't tell much of a difference between analysts/associates from different banking backgrounds (everyone seems sharp), so I'm curious about how others perceive it.
I recently worked with a friend on a model (something not related to our groups), who is apparently a strong performer in his group ,and his model had multiple mistakes and his quality of work was not good (which surprised me). That interaction got me curious on the actual quality of analysts based on bank and group quality and if there is actually a major difference.
Bump
Beatae velit saepe ad delectus repellat molestias. Quos assumenda quia voluptatem non porro facere. Laboriosam sed beatae vitae modi ab eveniet.
Illo ut ipsam unde. Qui blanditiis sunt explicabo omnis porro iste culpa. Aliquam eum nam placeat velit omnis totam omnis.
Quas qui aut sunt nemo nisi. Quos praesentium consequatur magni magnam cumque. Suscipit modi qui illo. Dolorem in rerum sunt repudiandae nobis itaque ex. Fugiat consectetur quia maiores aliquam tempora animi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...