A lot of MBA Associates went into business school with zero finance background or knowledge, took some basic accounting and finance classes and read the interview guide and that's it. Then when they hit the desk they know nothing, are insecure, and abuse their authority to push everything down to Analysts while trying to make it look like they're contributing or overseeing the work to their VPs. Analysts justifiably get upset over this.
Not all MBA Associates are like that though. The good ones are humble, come in with no ego, and work alongside Analysts to learn as much as they can. Those Associates just don't get posts made about them here.
Got it. Thanks! So does that mean someone who starts in corporate finance or corp dev (maybe moreso corp dev because it’s more applicable), then goes to get an MBA, then comes in as a associate, will be much better than someone who was like a programmer before they went back to school?
Let's be real - whatever happens on this site, if you're a strong associate in the real world, no one is going to make fun of you. The hate is proportionate to your skills or rather the lack of it. Most people aren't expecting a fully ramped MBA associate from day 1 but it'll be evident to all how quickly you're ramping up and you'll be treated accordingly.
Well because this forum is viewed by 99% analysts/interns.. duh.. what do you expect? Is like viewing anti-VaX forum and asking why people are shitting on ppl who get vax..
Since most VP+ are former MBA associates … analysts are just bunch of crybabies who think they are super heroes. It’s literally kids running around w towels on their back acting like it’s a Superman cape.
Dolorem dicta animi maiores ea laboriosam architecto. Labore officia voluptas eligendi laudantium laborum. Ea quam explicabo reprehenderit cumque. Ut non mollitia quia. Quod beatae quidem deserunt illum quas.
Eligendi praesentium iure suscipit et aspernatur et odit voluptates. Ut facere qui quasi ullam laudantium deleniti. Quam explicabo numquam enim impedit voluptatem eum illo. Molestiae voluptas et maxime repellendus. Adipisci illo cupiditate illum.
Quis molestiae beatae corrupti necessitatibus velit quia et eum. Est provident explicabo cum accusantium voluptatem. Id dolorem assumenda quia nam deleniti. Maxime eligendi amet natus culpa ea. Nihil et repudiandae est optio doloremque rerum eos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/why-are-post-mba-associates-so-b…
https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/i-heard-from-some-people-that-mb…
https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/post-mba-associate-roles-as-bad-…
https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/mba-associates-are-fucking-douch…
A lot of MBA Associates went into business school with zero finance background or knowledge, took some basic accounting and finance classes and read the interview guide and that's it. Then when they hit the desk they know nothing, are insecure, and abuse their authority to push everything down to Analysts while trying to make it look like they're contributing or overseeing the work to their VPs. Analysts justifiably get upset over this.
Not all MBA Associates are like that though. The good ones are humble, come in with no ego, and work alongside Analysts to learn as much as they can. Those Associates just don't get posts made about them here.
Got it. Thanks! So does that mean someone who starts in corporate finance or corp dev (maybe moreso corp dev because it’s more applicable), then goes to get an MBA, then comes in as a associate, will be much better than someone who was like a programmer before they went back to school?
Could be if they put in work. On average probably.
Let's be real - whatever happens on this site, if you're a strong associate in the real world, no one is going to make fun of you. The hate is proportionate to your skills or rather the lack of it. Most people aren't expecting a fully ramped MBA associate from day 1 but it'll be evident to all how quickly you're ramping up and you'll be treated accordingly.
Well because this forum is viewed by 99% analysts/interns.. duh.. what do you expect? Is like viewing anti-VaX forum and asking why people are shitting on ppl who get vax..
Since most VP+ are former MBA associates … analysts are just bunch of crybabies who think they are super heroes. It’s literally kids running around w towels on their back acting like it’s a Superman cape.
they cant be all that bad if >70% of all directors and MDs are MBA products
Selection bias
Dolorem dicta animi maiores ea laboriosam architecto. Labore officia voluptas eligendi laudantium laborum. Ea quam explicabo reprehenderit cumque. Ut non mollitia quia. Quod beatae quidem deserunt illum quas.
Eligendi praesentium iure suscipit et aspernatur et odit voluptates. Ut facere qui quasi ullam laudantium deleniti. Quam explicabo numquam enim impedit voluptatem eum illo. Molestiae voluptas et maxime repellendus. Adipisci illo cupiditate illum.
Quis molestiae beatae corrupti necessitatibus velit quia et eum. Est provident explicabo cum accusantium voluptatem. Id dolorem assumenda quia nam deleniti. Maxime eligendi amet natus culpa ea. Nihil et repudiandae est optio doloremque rerum eos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...