Believe Citi SF Tech has a brutal culture but great deal flow and exits as of late. Here's a comment from another post:

Can confirm that Citi SF Tech is progressing rapidly and have emerged as a key player in large-cap tech M&A, though haven't heard a lot of good things about their culture/hours and it seems like a very brutal experience for analysts since the group runs quite lean at the junior level.

Nonetheless, they've worked on a number of sizable M&A deals so far this year, such as being the exclusive sell-side advisor to Mimecast's $5.8bn sale to Permiraexclusive buy-side advisor to SK Hynix's $9.0bn acquisition of Intel's NAND/SSD business, buy-side advisor to Vista Equity Partners & Evergreen Coast Capital's $16.5bn acquisition of Citrix, and buy-side advisor to Broadcom's $69.7bn acquisition of VMware, just to name a few. They've also recently won a few major ($10bn+) M&A mandates, so deal-flow is ramping up quickly. Makes for a great technical experience at the analyst level given the size/complexity of the deals and the fact that they do M&A in-house, if that's what you're looking for. 

My firm has worked across Citi SF Tech on a few deals and it's clear that they've got some really sharp analysts, but everyone seem to be overworked as deal teams are often understaffed across the juniors. Exits-wise, they have done great recently especially this past cycle, with analysts going to top MF/UMM PEfirms such as Silver LakeThoma BravoCarlyle, Permira, Elliot Management (Evergreen), Hg Capital, GI PartnersCharlesbank, H.I.G., Marlin Equity, and Vector Capital. If you're interested in growth equity, they've also placed analysts into some of the best GE shops, including TA Associates, Summit, JMI Equity, Softbank, and Spectrum Equity. If you don't mind the bad culture/hours and just want to spend 2 years in IB and exit to the buy-side, this could be a great role. Probably not the best place if you want to stay in IBfor the long-term and want a better lifestyle/WLB.

 

Didn't they just move into new offices down there? Made a big deal out of it in their recruiting presentation.

 

Bofa > EVR > Jefferies

Before all Jeff hardos come at me, they're a phenominal fast growing shop, but BoFa has a chokehold. Evercore NYC is phenominal, but it kind of feels like they fall behind other EB tech shops (Laz, Qatalyst, etc) in the SF area.

Also BOFA chill AF. Evercore is gonna kill you or try to at least, and Jefferies is known for being THE sweatshop. If you don't cry in the bathroom at 1AM then it isn't Jefferies.

Best Exits come to Bofa, then EVR, then Jeff. But honestly you'll get looks from all three for pretty much everything (besides MF w/ Jeff).

Per deal flow, BOFA and EVR like big boy tickets, Jeff is a volume shop, and historically take smaller cases.

Learning Experience goes to EVR/Jeff > BoFA, smaller teams means more responsibility and less sleep. But you hold the pen on models.

Note: A1 at BB, no skin in the game

 

Thx for the help! How good is Jefferies' exits if I work my a off for two years

 

Dude if you go to a decent school jefferies will take you further then some BB’s. It’s a growing firm, but culture is VERY group dependent.

You’ll get good looks, trust.

(EVR is daddy tho)

 

I c, but I chatted w their associate, the recruiting person, and he seems lik the nicest person I have chatted w

 

tbh I would rather work on software deals than internet or semis

 

Mm I hear you - I agree software deals are better for PE exits (Sponsors are not buying unprofitable marketplace internet companies or D2C anymore).

However, the model at EVR MP is to transact the same type of software upper mid-market assets to the same sponsors non-stop (the Software SMD has made his practice the closest to a recurring business as you can do in banking).

As Robert Smith famously said "Software companies taste like chicken" so your typical process will be: 100 page bakeoff for an obscure identity security company based in the Midwest. You'll do a non-strategic very sponsor focused fast-paced process. Respond to DD requests ASAP 24/7/365. Then you'll close and do it again, and again, and again...

 
Most Helpful

One thing I would note for BofA PA - there is a meaningful difference in the lifestyle of analysts depending on your bucket. The group generally "gives up" on bottom bucket analysts, and they tend to have a great lifestyle because of it. For the top/upper middle bucket analysts (ie - the best 4 out of 15 analysts in the group), they generally get worked like a dog. Was a few years ago but speaking from experience, I had hours as bad as my friends at banks known for being sweaty simply because BofA PA really cranks it's best analysts. They tend to over staff them, give them the most time consuming stuff, etc. And this rang true for the other analysts at the top of the group. I know this is probably partially true at other banks, but the spread was horrific at BofA. The bottom bucket analyst probably worked 60 hours a week and the top bucket would consistently eclipse 100 or more. Staffers would even say they’re not giving staffings to bottom bucket analysts and ask the top to just shoulder another. MDs and VPs would refuse to take certain analyst and then just staff who they wanted. Anyways, I just bring this up because yes the group is generally less bad on bottom and middle bucket analysts, but for the top ~4, I would expect hours as bad as almost anyone.

 

This is a fascinating post. I knew bofa could be laid back, but RIP to those 4 analysts

 

Associate 1 in PE - LBOs

One thing I would note for BofA PA - there is a meaningful difference in the lifestyle of analysts depending on your bucket. The group generally "gives up" on bottom bucket analysts, and they tend to have a great lifestyle because of it. For the top/upper middle bucket analysts (ie - the best 4 out of 15 analysts in the group), they generally get worked like a dog. Was a few years ago but speaking from experience, I had hours as bad as my friends at banks known for being sweaty simply because BofA PA really cranks it's best analysts. They tend to over staff them, give them the most time consuming stuff, etc. And this rang true for the other analysts at the top of the group. I know this is probably partially true at other banks, but the spread was horrific at BofA. The bottom bucket analyst probably worked 60 hours a week and the top bucket would consistently eclipse 100 or more. Staffers would even say they're not giving staffings to bottom bucket analysts and ask the top to just shoulder another. MDs and VPs would refuse to take certain analyst and then just staff who they wanted. Anyways, I just bring this up because yes the group is generally less bad on bottom and middle bucket analysts, but for the top ~4, I would expect hours as bad as almost anyone.

I mean this’ll be true at most banks to be fair. See this in my group as well where the best get grinded just given the technical nature of the group (regularly stay till 3-5am) and the worst analysts leave at 10pm every day.

 

Evercore MP is the best out of the three, but beware the culture there is brutal. Also should note that BofA PA verticalizes analysts between coverage and M&A.

 

Yep thx! Yep know about the M&A and Coverage. If I wanna go to Coverage, does that mean Lik I wouldn’t learn that much cuz all the technical works outsourced to M&A group?

 

Depends on your interests. The analysts I know in coverage are fine with it because they're interested in learning about the tech companies themselves and also doing a lot more ECM work (which when markets are normal are a big part of tech banking). If you want to focus on M&A definitely go for M&A though.

 

Ratione rem consequatur impedit quas eius. Necessitatibus error ex possimus. Sit nostrum repellat quia aut enim. Laudantium autem itaque quos quae aut.

Voluptatibus sapiente ut voluptas tempore tempora voluptatum. Velit sit dicta laudantium tenetur sapiente omnis placeat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”