To almost no one's surprise, the Oracle of Omaha Warren Buffett managed to strike a better deal for Goldman Sachs than the Treasury did. For half the investment Hank Paulson made, Buffett managed to garner 4 times the equity for his shareholders than the U.S. taxpayer received under the Treasury bailout.
“Paulson said he had to make it attractive to banks, which is code for ‘I’m going to give money away,’” said Joseph Stiglitz, who won a Nobel Prize in 2001 for his work on the economic value of information.“The worst aspect of this is that they were designed not to do what they were supposed to do,” he said in a telephone interview from Paris Jan. 7. “In many ways, it’s not only a giveaway, but a giveaway that was designed not to work.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&r…
As word of the disbursal of TARP funds trickles out, we will no doubt see many instances of the government overpaying for toxic crap. With Obama warning that we should all get used to trillion dollar deficits, at what point does the well run dry?
long live the intelligent investors.
maybe paulson should have picked up some of the ben graham writings.
..there's a difference in buffet's investment and the government's bailout. buffet was looking to garner a sexy ROI while paulson was trying to prevent anymore financial calamities.
We're about to enter a Great Depression. Don't you want a president who's already dressed for it?
You also need to consider the fact that Paulson needed a buy in from everyone, even if they don't need the fund. He can't afford to have well off firm like GS not be part of the program. otherwise a firm might as well declare bankruptcy as taking TARP money will be a sign of serious financial stress.
Either way... with the terms Buffet worked out with GS, it should be an embarrassment to Paulson. Paulson use to work for GS... He probably got a cut.
Hmm. Whereas Buffett was admonished a few months ago for the stupidity he showed in making this deal, he seems to now be praised far and wide for the same deal.
Dolorem aliquid voluptates aut laborum maiores. Eius rerum aut dignissimos dicta. Beatae ratione nemo qui excepturi cupiditate alias recusandae.
Et eius rerum nam et architecto dicta veritatis. Molestias sit eum eos quia ad. Minima deleniti aspernatur ipsa architecto accusamus sint hic. Quam omnis totam ab iste beatae aut ut. Voluptas quo et sit quae omnis beatae voluptas. Id delectus deserunt rerum quam et hic. Ab ut dolor rerum occaecati.
Nesciunt perferendis consectetur earum vitae adipisci. Tempore iure maxime enim et cupiditate quia. Deserunt et voluptas non animi adipisci ratione. Aliquid ullam asperiores qui totam natus consectetur qui. Voluptas aut quod dolor suscipit necessitatibus ad qui.
Minus eveniet ipsum nihil minima voluptatem placeat sed aliquam. Iusto id quia odit qui. Est voluptates quae eius ut ea totam eligendi alias.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...