Change to IB Spring week recruiting this year?

Currently first year on a 4 year course so applying for spring weeks next year (so yes it may be early to be talking abt this) and my friends on 3 year courses have just gone through their applications and many of them said they got way more technical Qs than expected (supposedly more than previous years) and secondly that way more offers were being made to lesser-targeted unis eg Bath. I was wondering if anyone could confirm if there is any truth to this? It might affect how I prep for applying to spring weeks. Any shared observations would be valuable. Thanks.

7 Comments
 

Yes, it's true, apart from DEI events the banks are expecting higher lv of technical competency this yr.

UCL non-DEIs r rlly struggling while QMUL/Bath/Exeter/KCL ppl are bagging multiple offers, also very hard preference for DEIs this yr.

 

More applicants so need to raise the bar. When i went through the spring application process, I was actually quite disappointed at the lack of technicals - I feel like this is a move to a more meritocratic pipeline, rather than assuming talent based off signals ie. Unis (Coming from a target student)

Not sure about the non-target/semi stuff, but even last year there was quite a bit of Notts/Bath/Durham/Bristol/KCL for springs at the BBs. Those semis/non-targets didn't really do so well at summer conversions or even regular summer apps 

 
Most Helpful

By any chance are you a target student hating on non-targets / semi-targets?

Anyways, I come from non-target. I agree last year (2023-2024) there was basically no technicals which made the process for springs much easier and there was nothing to really test merit. Also a huge focus on DEI has helped people at my non-target get spring weeks as there is quite a high number of DEI candidates at my non-target. I disagree with conversions, my non-target has a great amount of people who convert springs (definitely on the same rate of conversions to targets despite all the extra support), but from what I hear, summer conversions are also less merit based than real summer applications. In regards to summer applications I agree, seems like target universities usually perform better and only the top standout candidates from non-targets and semi-targets end up getting an offer. Of course, summer applications have a huge element of luck in even getting a interview where the few standout candidates from non-targets and semi-targets will not have the chance to interview, in comparison to targets where there's a larger number of 'better' candidates than your average non-target.

 

No, I’m not, I actually go to a semi-target.

I didn’t know that recruiting for summers was harder for non/semi-targets than springs, in fact I thought it was the other way around (I don’t have much basis for this though). I thought this because for summers, firms have to recruit more seriously as it’s closer to grad recruitment and so they would do it as meritocratically as possible and would pay less attention to uni brand and focus more on the individual’s competence, but you say this isn’t the case? Not what I really wanted to hear but thanks for the comment. If you could perhaps explain further why targets do better in summer that would be great.

 

Adipisci delectus dolorum tempora sit officia et aliquid. Expedita commodi iure nostrum veritatis ipsam alias. Sed veniam ab voluptas.

Dolor qui in quidem consequuntur expedita. Quo qui minus est harum voluptatem quam qui. Exercitationem illum a et omnis aut deserunt. Et quo repellat fugit quia. Qui ducimus ea nulla officia officia asperiores dolor.

Sequi quos consequatur omnis. Est quo voluptas soluta et dolor. Nihil ducimus velit voluptatum suscipit.

Quam sapiente reprehenderit saepe consequatur eaque reiciendis nulla. Omnis est illo impedit et sint est. Tempora minus aut consequatur distinctio. Quod voluptatum dignissimos pariatur repudiandae omnis dolor. Incidunt officiis at itaque maxime. Sunt eos rem itaque et. Animi eaque accusamus inventore odio nemo ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”