Is it common-enough for the acquisition target to need confidentiality in its identity while the identity of potential buyer seeking to buy the target to acquire does not need to be confidential? For instance, is it common enough for a pending deal listed on a CV to have the acquirer named target (without needing confidentiality) while the target company is left unidentified to preserve confidentiality.
| +161 | As Lehman people reconvene at UBS, Barclays needs to hire (2023) | 23 | 23h |
| +133 | Is pay at BofA really that bad? | 64 | 8h |
| +90 | Day at Macquarie | 12 | 1d |
| +81 | Worlds Worst MDs Competition (2026 Edition) | 17 | 8h |
| +46 | How bad did I mess up | 10 | 1d |
| +33 | Lindsay Clancy - Thoughts from A2 | 6 | 5h |
| +31 | Misrepresented Houston IB | 14 | 2d |
| +29 | No BB RO 2026 | 10 | 3d |
| +29 | JPM SMALL CAP or WF/JEF/RBC Coverage group | 13 | 1d |
| +24 | T(ouse)D Securities | 9 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Consectetur dolor magni voluptatem reiciendis totam et. Provident consequuntur est et qui. Qui facere velit dignissimos.
Labore fugit sed at autem. Doloribus odit ut ullam. Sunt ut fuga eius minus. Et est quia quisquam dicta alias est voluptate.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...