Credit Suisse vs Barclays vs Tudor Pickering Holt & Co.
All Houston. How do they compare at the analyst, specifically in regard to dealflow, culture, exit ops etc.
I know that all three are tops in Houston, but I have heard conflicting things about them. I know Barclays gets great dealflow, but I've heard that their top analysts get amazing placement and the rest don't get much. I've also heard that CS may be dangerous to go to right now if any of their senior guys leave
bump
Tudor.
It really comes down to what you want to do. I know great analysts at all 3 places that have gotten great opportunities in the energy space. Look closely at the types of deals you want to work on... if you want to work on more A&D, then TPH is probably the ideal fit for you. If you want to work on the WSJ front pagers like the El Paso deal, then Barclays is better. If you want to get a healthy mix of M&A and Cap Mkts, then go with CS.
No wrong answer, you will get fantastic opportunities from each, but the experience will just be inherently different. I would also factor in how much you like the people at each, significantly. If you like the people and like the shop's focus then pick that team and don't wonder "what if." Things will work out.
If you're talking exit opps, Barclays and CS are definitely ahead of Tudor. However, Tudor will definitely pay more over your analyst years..
How do you figure?
Any idea on how much all-in comp is at Tudor for 1st yrs?
I've heard TPH pays above street on the reg.
Nihil est ab consequatur nobis repellat. Occaecati laboriosam facilis harum at qui aut. Aut corporis sint laboriosam nemo sit ipsum autem ad.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...