23 Comments
 

$300k I can see -- $500k for a 2nd yr analyst is highly unlikely but not technically impossible in the following scenario:

1) kid is an absolute rockstar. He/she gets on the desk, and is running the entire process out of the gate

2) maybe they brought in a big deal and is already sourcing with their relationships so they brought in $1mm in fees and/or

3) maybe this was the only way CS could hold onto him/her since he/she had multiple megafund PE offers + other options?

If this M&A analyst sees this post and wants to confirm it anonymously with me, just shoot me a PM or email and I will confirm it to the WSO community so that everyone can give you a big congrats...

https://media0.giphy.com/media/g9582DNuQppxC/giphy-downsized.gif" alt="congrats" />

 

Patrick,

The only way that kind of salary works is in scenario 2. While I think that scenario one is plausible, it's not 500K/Year plausible, let alone 300K/Year. As far as scenario 3 is concerned, that kind of pay raise might set the expectations for other analysts in that position at CS and artificially raise comp as a result.

The thing with scenario 2 is that they need to have a pipeline of deals in the works or have brought in enough revenue to justify that kind of salary. Bringing in $1MM in fees just seems too low to justify that kind of payout. Depending on the fee scale, we're talking between 45MM and 100MM for the deal size. That just seems unusual. Just thinking about it from a brokerage commission perspective, becase it's the easiest way to look at the justified cost. Now, don't quote me on this for M&A transaction splits, but on the brokerage side, most firms fee schedule reflects the production level of the employee. Splits range anywhere form 77%/23% to as high as 48%42%. If this is their first deal, getting a 50/50% seems way out of the ordinary. I'd argue that the split is closer to 77%/23%, so if they earn $500K/Year, they have to be generating ~4.5MM in fees (against ~450MM in total deal size) to justify that salary. However, I'm sure that this offer has to be contingent on their continued generation of new business as well. There is just way too much variability here to make me believe that it's true. And this is also before any other fees that may be taken out of the earnings. So that number could easily double. If this is a rockstar analyst whos doing that, I'd believe it in a heartbeat. But, I'm skeptical.

Now, if this was an MD in Equity Research, where the Analyst title is common, I'd believe that in a heartbeat.

 

Based on what I know, CS has some sort of program where analysts/associates can earn some kind of credit towards deal revenues even if they don't actually bring it in themselves. Its meant to rewards the one to initially find the company/generate some type of idea that leads to a successful pitch.

Not sure on the specifics as it was explained pretty briefly by someone I knew who had summered there junior year. Seemed like even they were kind of confused by it, but it's a potential explanation for why one individual's comp might have been so high.

 

For #1 how does a person prove himself/herself to be that competent at that junior of a level? Doesn't make sense given industry standards. What do you say while negotiating? I can't imagine anything but that person sounding very obnoxious, which wouldn't get him/her very good points on personality.

 

Veritatis voluptatibus vel aut voluptate qui. Repudiandae id repellendus aut ut sit quia voluptatibus. Exercitationem illo fugiat natus quo explicabo. Harum repudiandae eos quaerat iusto. Explicabo quis sint sed debitis. Repellendus magnam nam qui ipsam eveniet voluptates magni fugit. Officiis est quod voluptatem porro.

Ipsum unde natus libero ea nihil nulla adipisci ut. Illum et quas aperiam et. Aut ut aliquid molestiae. Et voluptatem repudiandae est totam reiciendis. Temporibus ipsum quos tempore veniam. Illum sint consequatur voluptatibus quia deleniti similique voluptatem.

Soluta in error delectus minus ut facilis. Enim neque ducimus ut accusantium harum dolore fugit. Praesentium commodi consequatur et nisi inventore et officiis.

Qui laboriosam eos quia est aut. Provident aliquid dolorem molestiae numquam totam sed. Quis qui modi voluptatibus blanditiis perferendis nemo cumque et. Aut ratione pariatur sint ut incidunt pariatur.

Don't @ me

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”