Determining the value of a canidate/employee using IB valuation techniques

I remember reading an investment banking interview prep question a while back about how one might value an apple tree and the answer was the same way you would value a company: by looking at what comparable apple trees are worth (relative valuation) and the value of the apple tree's cash flows (intrinsic valuation). The interview guide went on to state that you could do a DCF for anything.

This had got me thinking recently. If a company were to value one of their employees or a potential candidate using some sort of valuation technique, which technique(s) could they use? How might one factor in a candidate's experience, skills, education (including GPA, major, school ranking/prestige), any licenses, and proficiency in any languages or specific applications (i.e. excel, python, SQL, etc.)?

Ideally I would like to use this feedback to try and build out a model. No idea if it will actually work but it would be interesting to build all the same.

6 Comments
 

Income Approach: Look at the money the employee adds value to the firm at through increasing revenue or decreasing costs (Efficiencies)

Market Approach: Similar candidate credentials opportunity costs

Cost Approach: Amount it would cost to complete job without candidate and/or cost of employee to grow skill-set (education) to do job

 
Best Response

I was thinking that when a firm hires an employee and presents an offer letter with stated compensation that is essentially an LBO...right? How much they'd be willing to pay someone in return for their work to get a target amount of production for their firm.

What if we were to value an employee based on skills and qualifications relative to the job available. For example, I am an IB firm and looking to hire an entry level analyst and wanted to differentiate 3 candidates from one another based on relative value.

Candidate 1: Graduating this May from a target school (Target school 3.4 GPA). IB Internship with boutique firm summer prior and an internship in wealth management the summer before that. No licenses. While in school held no jobs.

Candidate 2: Graduated 2 year ago this May (Non-Target school 3.8 GPA ). 1.5 years of experience in consulting for Big 4 firm. No licenses. Prior to graduating, worked for same consulting firm as an assurance intern. While in school worked as TA for university's economics department.

Candidate 3: Graduated 3 years ago this May (Non-Target school 3.6 GPA). 2.5 years of experience in financial sales at a Bulge Bracket firm. Hold Series 7 and 66 licenses. Prior to graduating, interned with Fortune 500 firm doing clerical accounting work as well as presentation and excel sheet prep for managers. While in school worked as a research assistant for the university's Tech Transfer program.

How would we try and value these three candidates? Maybe using a SOTP valuation? How would I try and put a value on each of these skills/experiences/licenses/etc?

 

You don't need any valuation for that. Either you want one candidate for the work hes able to produce or for status of having attended a brand name school

Candidate 1 went to a target so he's your status candidate (important to small boutiques when hiring)

Candidate 3 is obviously the most qualified and the 3.8 vs 3.6 is hardly a difference. Candidate 3 has his licenses as well so you don't have to pay for that. And he's already worked at the BB level.

What concert costs 45 cents? 50 Cent feat. Nickelback.
 

Aliquam quia magni architecto maiores labore autem. Omnis dignissimos placeat ullam ratione. Perferendis illum dolor culpa dolorum ad nihil. Vel veritatis amet non labore quia aut voluptatem. Eum molestiae maiores aliquam tenetur dicta est. Voluptas eos voluptatum ut rerum suscipit ad nobis.

Est ducimus odio illo. Eum consectetur illum voluptatum velit sed eos dolore.

Aspernatur architecto vel assumenda quaerat id. Molestias et culpa quo et natus. Repudiandae inventore illum eveniet quisquam eum consectetur. Accusamus distinctio vel quam. Maxime quasi et sit incidunt architecto consequatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”