9 Comments
 

I mean I’d guess the better the bank ur at the more you’ll see an impact in the form of lower return rates since they’d likely more aggressively implement AI solutions. For boutiques I’d think stuff won’t change as much immediately as in 1-2 yrs

 

it just means the interns who can't leverage AI will look crap in comparison the one's who can and therefore don't get returns

 

 

As someone who's worked with CS and Stats PhDs who specialize in Ai, none of them want to work for JPMorgan. If you're smart enough to be really good, you go work in silicon valley if you have passion, and if you want to make money you work for trading firms/hedge funds. 

This is something I'm rather shocked by, is that Dimon seems to want to make JPMorgan an Ai focused firm, but still pays and treats ai staff like cost centers instead of revenue generators. Until that changes, don't actually expect to see massive changes. Watch what they say, not what they do. Dimon still pays bankers like revenue generation and ai staff like cost centers. That means they're just saying stuff to get investors on board, not because they're planning some major internal revolution. If they were, Dimon's not dumb enough to think he can pull top talent paying below FAANG company rates. 

 

Basically he means hire a few people that develop ai agents that have organizational context 

I'm friends with a few devs internally where we've talked about this and it's really not that complex

You also really don't need that many of these people either 

 

You also really don't need that many of these people either 

I'm guessing you're either talking about using some sort of open source model, maybe Gemma or Llama, and retooling it for your own needs. That's what a lot of firms are doing. It's that or an API to Anthropic or something. 

The problem is that this isn't terribly complex in a window. But you still need a lot of smart people to deal with the edge cases. Scaling is a big one. What happens when most people internally start using this Ai? How do you ensure it scales to internal usage? JPMC has 300k employees, at least 500 petabytes of data. That's across many organizational levels. How do you ensure proper scaling, proper data intake and data engineering, proper security? Do you utilize mix of agents? How do you ensure that you don't have token costs that explode? How do you utilize thinking models properly, so that you aren't constantly billing to high or xHigh Opus and costing yourself billions per quarter?

I'm friends with a few devs internally where we've talked about this and it's really not that complex

If it wasn't so complex, you wouldn't need thousands of people to do these things. Tbh, most devs at banks aren't very good. I say this having worked in banks, prop shops, and hedge funds. The devs at banks were usually bottom of the barrel. I cannot tell you how bad the technical debt at my bank was. This seems more like a Dunning Kruger affect of some people who maybe had 1 ML class in college and never spent any time on MLOps or data pipelines like ETL. The infrastructure to serve ML is oftentimes much harder, especially at a place like JPMC where the legacy code is older than most bankers. 

 

Rerum officia aut aut fuga eum ratione nihil. Et est assumenda dolores neque in. Incidunt quaerat magnam aperiam vitae nulla animi. Nulla illum culpa corporis magnam. Molestias quaerat ut minus doloribus et dolores.

Ea sit inventore ducimus quisquam. Et quas quos nisi esse adipisci non.

Sit iusto repellat sint molestiae animi nihil nam. Consectetur esse adipisci vitae eligendi architecto nisi. Ratione vel repellendus neque. Libero aliquid in ut omnis. Quo modi repellat quod eligendi consectetur. In nesciunt voluptatibus laborum sit quia natus non.

Vero animi mollitia voluptates non. Consequatur et fuga quos maiores eius. Aperiam est id aut est. Vero accusamus debitis sed similique dolore atque ut. Esse et iure sint numquam consectetur. Cum repellat nisi vel consequatur. Aspernatur eum omnis modi et reiciendis cupiditate eum sint.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”