Doing one for a stock pitch for an investment club. Is there any quicker way to do it? Intuitively with the accounts needed for a DCF I could always take the shortcut and project capex as a % of sales and depreciation as a % of capex, but do industry professionals build a full 3 statement model with depreciation/debt/NWC schedule every time they do a DCF analysis(or more specifically, calculating unlevered free cash flow as capex/dep/change in NWC is projected).
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +370 | Evercore Intern Seizure | 54 | 14h |
| +71 | JPM M&A is Gone??? Purely Coverage Banking??? | 31 | 13h |
| +62 | Is DCM actually underrated ? | 24 | 1d |
| +51 | How do I understand vs. just memorizing? | 8 | 4h |
| +48 | Losing my personality in Banking | 9 | 1d |
| +47 | Are all Tech / TMT groups sweaty? | 38 | 1d |
| +42 | Associate & Above IB exits | 16 | 4d |
| +33 | Incoming IB Analyst: Best Ways to Prepare? | 11 | 5h |
| +27 | Which groups are ideal for laterals? | 12 | 1d |
| +24 | Thoughts on PEI Global Partners? | 4 | 1d |
Career Resources
Yes, most people would. You want CFs to be accurate as possible, right? If the company is mature, chances are their given working capital capital ratios are fairly consistent (that would depend, but I am going to say generally). Forecast using these, unless you expect something else.
Of course. To add on to what CMoore0520 said, you will probably not stop at a DCF, making the operating more useful when you start your LBO, merger model, etc.
No, they don't. It really depends on the situation and timeline. It can also depend on your group
If you're doing a quick and dirty DCF valuation analysis (e.g. as part of a pitchbook) using only public information (e.g. company filings, equity research), then often times a full 3-statement operating model is not needed. You can project out the main line items/schedules, use company guidance, use equity research estimates, make general assumptions/flatline (% of sales) etc. When your information is limited, building an overly detailed/complex model can be redundant. Too many assumptions can lead to false precision (garbage in, garbage out.)
If you're working on a more important project or a live deal, then you'll have better, more detailed financial forecasts (e.g. management model, seller model, input from tax advisors etc). In this case, building a 3-statement model is the norm.
That being said, since your project is for school and you likely have the time, I would just build the 3-statement model for practice.
No one has mentioned this but you can also do something in between i.e. revenue + expense building -> forecasted income statement -> DCF.
Aliquid sit aliquam id aperiam in possimus eveniet. Omnis sunt rerum officia rerum dignissimos provident quibusdam.
Delectus repellat ut omnis iure minus corrupti. Qui voluptas magni repellat officia numquam. Nostrum laborum magnam aut perferendis nemo.
Ea quia sed repellendus est atque ex. Odit maxime minima dolor non blanditiis et. Tempora est consectetur aut. Numquam fugiat qui quo ut beatae autem nam doloribus. Facilis iusto saepe et fuga aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...