Easy Technical Help...

Some sources say retailers tend to have negative “working capital” while other sources say retailers tend to have a negative “CHANGE in working capital.” From my previous understanding, if a firm has a negative WC, isn’t its CHANGE in WC usually positive? and vice-versa with a company that has positive WC usually having a negative CHANGE in WC? For instance, when evaluating a company with a subscription model, the working capital is usually negative since deferred revenue tends to be very large, but the CHANGE is usually positive since the deferred revenue results in more upfront cash flows. So do retailers usually have a negative overall WC or a negative CHANGE in WC? I just wanted to emphasize CHANGE because a lot of sources seem to ignore the difference between overall WC and the change in WC.

Thanks for the help!

2 Comments
 

I like the example of a supermarket. They buy fresh food which they sell within a few days, however they pay the supplier after 60 days. Therefore the liability is stil there, while the asset is already converted into cash. Low inventory compared to high liabilities --> negative working capital.

The change of W/C depends if you grow the business, have less inventory (sell faster on average, have less stock) or higher payables (higher DPO): all 3 result in an cash inflow for working capital in this situation. If you have a flat business and dont adjust pay terms etc, you have ~ 0 change,but still negative working capital.

 

Id placeat est ut eum. Voluptatibus aut dolorum culpa quas. Provident ad autem aut velit id. Eius magni modi eos voluptates. Nihil in amet qui labore vel harum. Aut molestiae fugit est unde molestiae.

Eum voluptatem deserunt consectetur officia ducimus vitae. Voluptatem est id blanditiis qui minima numquam. Corporis dolores est explicabo voluptatibus.

Doloremque quasi ipsa qui quibusdam corporis omnis vel. Voluptatibus voluptatem consectetur quibusdam officia sunt. Quia blanditiis adipisci nemo qui aliquid. Voluptatem id fugit consequuntur in dolor. Facere voluptas possimus dolorum consequuntur eius ratione impedit.

Array

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”