EBIT vs EBITDA for Retail/cap-intensive companies?

I'm reading a lot of conflicting info on this. The M&I guide says you should use EV/EBIT multiple for companies in industries where D&A is large to account for capex. I would assume Consumer & Retail falls into this asset-heavy category due to manufacturing properties, retail stores, etc. So I would think to use EBIT.

But why then is EV/EBITDA and EV/EBITDAR used more for Consumer & Retail companies? If rent is a big part of these companies, why exclude it in EBITDAR? And why exclude D&A in EBITDA if this industry is asset-heavy? This goes against the logic of what was mentioned in the guides.

6 Comments
 

You exclude rent in EBITDAR because it plays a large part in these consumer companies.

You want to compare apples to apples so if you compare one company that owns its retail properties vs one that rents its retail properties, assuming same sales and margins, the company that owns its properties will have a higher EBITDA. But if you exclude rent then they will have the same EBITDAR and thus have the same multiple.

 

Thanks for the response, but i was wondering why the guides say to use EBIT for asset-heavy industries like retail but retail companies use EV/EBITDA or EV/EBITDAR. I wasn't really asking why rent is excluded.

 

Okay thanks — so about what's in the M&I guides, does that just not apply to retail? It was very general like "use EBIT for capital-intensive" which I thought retail falls under

 
Most Helpful

When I think of capital-intensive companies I usually think of automobile, O&G, telecoms, and transportation.

For retail, I wouldn't necessarily call it capital intensive since many retailers I know of don't own factories like polo ralph lauren, Lulu and UNIQLO. They purchase their product from suppliers (who would be considered capital intensive since they are the ones who need to purchase and maintain those factories).

Just my thoughts

 

Ipsum voluptatem dolore animi magni. Quia porro expedita error et. Laboriosam eveniet eos ipsa voluptatibus. Qui non odio aliquid illo similique qui.

Perferendis rem sed voluptates delectus debitis reprehenderit. Provident magnam eius nihil itaque voluptate autem. Rerum non quia sunt ex.

Exercitationem doloribus ullam ratione et non. Inventore tempore eum harum ab. Est ea omnis atque mollitia nobis et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”