Enterprise value question - A bit confused

I'm currently studying for CFA level III and going through some valuation concepts for upcoming interviews, and I'm a bit confused with some of the notions surrounding enterprise value. In Breaking Into Wall Street's IB interview guide, it says the following:

"If you say that Debt “adds to” Enterprise Value, you’re implying that raising Debt can change a company’s Enterprise Value – which is not true!"

Ok, so from what I understand, if a company raises $100 of debt, its cash balance increases by $100. So the net effect on EV is 0 (since Debt increases EV by 100 but then cash decreases EV by 100).

But what if the company immediately buys fixed assets (machinery or whatever) with the cash immediately. From my understanding, the EV would increase by $100, since debt increased by $100 and cash did not increase (because it was immediately used to buy equipment). Is my reasoning correct?

14 Comments
 

I think yours is the best answer. Effectively once the cash is invested then the EV should move initially based on the projected value creation of the investment (the company's cash flow profile changes) and in the long run based on the actual performance of that investment (which could also be value destructive if things go south).

"If you say that Debt "adds to" Enterprise Value, you're implying that raising Debt can change a company's Enterprise Value - which is not true!"

This statement is actually wrong because it does not specify the time horizon. At the exact time of the debt raise indeed the EV does not change. However, the debt raise proceeds must be used for something and those actions will eventually alter the company's EV.

 

For these type of questions I think it's always better to think about the company's business from first principles: Enterprise Value as the value of the company's core operations (which is also why we make adjustments for equity interests and non-controlling interests). So when you raise $100 of debt and get $100 in cash, none of those items actually affect a company's operations.

But when you spend that cash to buy fixed assets, the 'value' of the company's operations increase by $100. So yes, in that case, the EV would increase by $100.

Let's say the company used that $100 in cash to buy a 9.9% equity interest in another company. The EV here would not actually increase, despite the cash being used, because again it does not affect the company's core operations.

 

This is incorrect. The 9.9% equity interest is an operating asset that will bring extra income/cash flows into the enlarged group and hence the EV would change.

Alternatively, think about it this way. EV represents the total amount someone has to pay all stakeholders to acquire the company. Saying that the EV would not change after the company acquires a non-core equity interest in another company implies that the potential buyer would get the non-core equity interest for free which is not the case. It is not about whether the asset is core or non-core it is about whether the asset is operating or not.

 
Most Helpful

Sed esse asperiores consectetur non quae quasi possimus. Quam blanditiis eum vel debitis.

Ratione repellendus repellat cum. Minima quisquam ratione accusamus commodi laborum nihil. Sint nisi sit libero neque qui nostrum recusandae. Reiciendis veritatis sed asperiores libero et hic doloremque. Unde aut sunt consequatur consequatur.

Dolore aliquid ratione rem adipisci illum ipsam minima. Enim quaerat expedita consequatur sit. Aut molestiae et nobis et officiis est iure.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”