Enterprise value question - A bit confused

I'm currently studying for CFA level III and going through some valuation concepts for upcoming interviews, and I'm a bit confused with some of the notions surrounding enterprise value. In Breaking Into Wall Street's IB interview guide, it says the following:

"If you say that Debt “adds to” Enterprise Value, you’re implying that raising Debt can change a company’s Enterprise Value – which is not true!"

Ok, so from what I understand, if a company raises $100 of debt, its cash balance increases by $100. So the net effect on EV is 0 (since Debt increases EV by 100 but then cash decreases EV by 100).

But what if the company immediately buys fixed assets (machinery or whatever) with the cash immediately. From my understanding, the EV would increase by $100, since debt increased by $100 and cash did not increase (because it was immediately used to buy equipment). Is my reasoning correct?

14 Comments
 

I think yours is the best answer. Effectively once the cash is invested then the EV should move initially based on the projected value creation of the investment (the company's cash flow profile changes) and in the long run based on the actual performance of that investment (which could also be value destructive if things go south).

"If you say that Debt "adds to" Enterprise Value, you're implying that raising Debt can change a company's Enterprise Value - which is not true!"

This statement is actually wrong because it does not specify the time horizon. At the exact time of the debt raise indeed the EV does not change. However, the debt raise proceeds must be used for something and those actions will eventually alter the company's EV.

 

For these type of questions I think it's always better to think about the company's business from first principles: Enterprise Value as the value of the company's core operations (which is also why we make adjustments for equity interests and non-controlling interests). So when you raise $100 of debt and get $100 in cash, none of those items actually affect a company's operations.

But when you spend that cash to buy fixed assets, the 'value' of the company's operations increase by $100. So yes, in that case, the EV would increase by $100.

Let's say the company used that $100 in cash to buy a 9.9% equity interest in another company. The EV here would not actually increase, despite the cash being used, because again it does not affect the company's core operations.

 

This is incorrect. The 9.9% equity interest is an operating asset that will bring extra income/cash flows into the enlarged group and hence the EV would change.

Alternatively, think about it this way. EV represents the total amount someone has to pay all stakeholders to acquire the company. Saying that the EV would not change after the company acquires a non-core equity interest in another company implies that the potential buyer would get the non-core equity interest for free which is not the case. It is not about whether the asset is core or non-core it is about whether the asset is operating or not.

 
Most Helpful

Aut minus ad aut sit autem ut. Sint voluptas temporibus voluptate quo.

Sed consectetur asperiores commodi vitae vel ut aspernatur. Et velit dolorum consequatur id ea harum sed. Aut ut minus odit repellendus voluptates non. Accusantium facere et distinctio consequatur asperiores dicta. Blanditiis qui occaecati animi occaecati eos deleniti.

Eos ex unde impedit sed aut laboriosam. Quisquam odit placeat autem adipisci magnam. Rerum enim est aut eum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”