Most Helpful

Lazard and Rothschild stand above all other EBs in terms of presence and deal flow in Europe as you noted. Rothschild is definitely a bit more of a volume shop compared to Lazard, and Lazard also edges out Rothschild in terms of exits if you care about that.

PWP and PJT are the next strongest in terms of deal flow (and arguably on par with Lazard and Rothschild in terms of exits). PWP's deal flow in Europe is very strong, although it should be noted it's also very much oriented towards Industrials, P&U/Energy, and Telecom (and they also tend to be stronger in the EU than UK). Their rx deal flow is also solid as well. PJT's rx deal flow is much stronger than its M&A deal flow, although they still get their share of large mandates on the M&A side. 

CVP's presence in Europe is a bit smaller than PJT and PWP's, although they've been focused on building out their Paris office (and they've gotten some heavy hitters). Deal flow is still quite solid, and they've landed a number of large mandates in the past. RX presence in Europe isn't on par with PWP and PJT. They still exit very well.

Evercore is much more MM-oriented in Europe compared to their US deal flow, and in terms of deal experience and quality of deal flow Evercore isn't on par with PWP/PJT/CVP. The Evercore name still allows them to exit quite well though. Moelis and Greenhill are definitely also oriented towards the MM side in terms of deal flow, and while they still exit well, they don't do nearly as well as the others.

In terms of dealflow and deal experience, I'd argue it goes Lazard/Rothschild > PWP/PJT > CVP > Evercore > Moelis > Greenhill. In terms of exits, I'd argue it's Lazard > PJT/PWP/Rothschild > CVP/Evercore > Moelis > Greenhill. That being said, MFs in Europe tend to prefer GS/MS/JPM far more than every EB except maybe Lazard. 

 

Definitely very strong. Good mix of both debtor and creditor mandates, and their selective high-fee business model results in getting the most complex and hairy situations. Some recent mandates I can think of include creditor-side advising on Holland & Barrett's exit from Russia, advising H2O on the whole Lars Windhorst mess, debtor-side on Garrett Motion's Chapter 11, creditor-side on NAC's Chapter 11. They were also on the highest-profile European RX/distressed deal so far this year advising Uniper on its rescue financing from the German government. 

 

From a London standpoint:
 

You’re really overstating PWP imo. Do you work there ? However it is probably better in Germany  

CVP is good but way below Laz/Roth. EVR is also not as good as the US.

I would not tier Greehill with Moelis. Moelis’ exit are at the same level as PWP/CVP imo and top tier for distressed/credit (many recent exits to Apollo and BX special sits teams). EVR I don’t know but not miles above 

PJT I would think is much better in RX than the rest.

 

Anyone have any idea on what Rothschilds strongest industry groups are? (London in particular) I've heard HC is decent but anyone know about Consumer or Industrials/BS?

 

C&R and Industrials are both strong but both have rough cultures.

 

Lazard and Rothschild have large Paris presences (should also note that the sovereign advisory teams for both firms are largely based out of there). Aside from those two, CVP and PWP also have quite strong Paris offices. CVP Paris is led by Pigasse (arguably the top dealmaker in France along with Messier) and covers quite a variety of industries, while PWP Paris focuses on Telecom, Infrastructure, and FIG and is led by rainmakers in the space. PJT also has a small presence in Paris.

 

The strongest boutiques in DACH (specifically Germany, although that's where most DACH groups are run out of) are definitely Rothschild, Lazard, and PWP.

Rothschild is in Frankfurt and has the largest presence in Germany by headcount. Like Rothschild everywhere else in Europe, the office churns out deals and by far does the highest volume when counting by number of deals, although they work on everything from the lower end of MM to large-cap client coverage. Strong across the board. They work their juniors hard, and the culture there is sweaty although people there tend to be pleasant.

PWP is in Munich and has by far the smallest office of the three, although PWP Munich is a powerhouse and the office works together often with the London team led by Dietrich Becker. The office has historically been run by Schenck and Jentzsch, who are among the two biggest individual rainmakers in German IB, although Schenck left to start Lazard's Munich office last year. Rumor is that PWP's reloaded by poaching MS's Co-Head of DACH IB, who's also very strong, so the office will likely be just fine. Historically the office is very large-cap focused, and it's a bit harder to compare the deal flow with Lazard/Rothschild given the much smaller headcount and as a result the fewer deals the office does, but PWP consistently gets on the region's headliner deals. Culture there is the best among the three offices. 

Lazard has offices in both Frankfurt and Munich. Most bankers are in Frankfurt, with Munich being a new office led by Schenck. Traditionally been a solid office although definitely weaker than Rothschild, but Schenck's a huge boost for the office. Deal flow has traditionally ranged from everywhere from MM to large-cap with strong volume, and Schenck will likely provide a boost to the firm's large-cap coverage in the region as well. Culture there is tough, and hours are high.

 

Quia voluptates mollitia autem eum corporis porro. Adipisci voluptatem quo ex et porro ad similique.

Dolorem non harum atque. In sed tempore aperiam officia eos natus est. Nobis molestiae voluptatum qui deserunt. At dolor perferendis molestiae laudantium.

 

Omnis aut earum eligendi suscipit. Et est aut et est ipsa qui officiis atque. Magnam voluptatem dolor dolore. Minima quas aspernatur qui qui placeat placeat. Molestias ea animi sed inventore totam inventore. Veritatis autem assumenda quod id velit necessitatibus ducimus.

Eaque ut deserunt ipsa. Est delectus suscipit dolores nemo molestiae et. In nulla et eveniet praesentium quaerat quis molestias.

Illo assumenda cupiditate dolores et. Magnam consequatur pariatur et autem voluptates fugiat. Mollitia dicta quod sapiente magnam quos.

Quis hic atque ullam nostrum provident amet. Aut in odio quos. Repellat nihil qui ullam maiores exercitationem veritatis. Esse aperiam non optio dolores ullam ut voluptatem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”