Most Helpful

Idk who needs to hear this but Tech and IB jobs are not even close to being substitutes for one another and this is a finance forum for people whom the majority are interested and working in finance and have no interest in being a coder.  

Idk why people are obsessed with comparing Finance to Tech. I don't care what Tech pays or how many hours they work. I don't want to work in Tech. It's just such a random comparison and people act like the two are borderline interchangeable and that anyone who goes into IB must SURELY have also considered a coding role. The vast majority of us don't give a shit lol. We like finance, so we work in finance. 

Then you have all these Tech morons that come to the forums saying stuff like "bro what a cope u know tech has way better hours", it's like dude nobody here cares about Tech jobs. It's a total non-sequitur in discussions about finance. It's like hopping into a discussion about motorcycles with a bunch of bikers and raving about how many MPG the new Prius gets. We don't care bro. None of us ever considered it or ever will. 

 

Agree with most of your comments but want to say that in some aspects it does matter. 

Why have banks raised analyst/associate salaries and started wfh policies? Is it because firms actually started to 'give a shit' about the well-being of 20-something individual folks? No, it's because they were losing talent to other industries (ex. tech). If tech starts laying off mass people (probably inevitable) and there is a hiring freeze, what incentives do banks/firms have to I) increase pay ii) improve WLB when they know that employees don't have any other leverage?

At the end of the day whether you work at FANG or IB at the analyst-VP level (and whatever equivalent it is in tech) you're just a cog in the machine and you want other industries to be paying well so that banking (or finance broadly) keeps up and continues to pay better to 'compete for talent. People think tech as just software engineering but I'm thinking roles such as PM, corp finance, strategy, etc. roles that many people have chosen to take instead of banking.

Yeah comparing a job in tech to a job in finance is dumb but to ignore the implications that the tech industry had and will have on finance is IMO a bit ignorant

 

IDK what firm you work at but from 2020 - 2022, tech was the second most popular exit from IB among all my friends in the NYC/SF/LA Finance scene, only narrowly beaten by PE (and even many people who went to PE seriously considered tech). So yes, it is extremely inaccurate to say people in finance don't care. Tech is a very comparable industry in that regard. 

 

The only thing we disagree on is semantics. Talking about doing Corp Dev, FP&A or Business Analysis as a substitute for banking makes sense because you're still comparing a Finance role to what ultimately boils down to a Business/Finance role, that just so happens to be at a firm within the Technology sector. 

For example if I leave IB to do Corp Dev at Amazon, I wouldn't see that as me choosing Tech over Finance. I'm just doing finance at a firm that happens to be in the Tech sector. My comment was more referring to people that compare SWE jobs to IB as though there is any similarity. Most of the comments I see here about comp/hours in "Tech" are people referring to what SWEs make and how much they work. People doing Corp Dev, Business Analyst (PM roles) and FP&A are all still working a finance gig whether they do it at Amazon or Nestle or Walmart or Tesla or GE or Raytheon. If someone takes a Corp Dev job at FedEx, I wouldn't be like "Damn man my boy left finance for the Shipping industry and he's crushing it. People who work in Shipping and Trucking have better hours and make almost as much money as people in Finance". 

Regardless, your point is well taken. 

 

Cool bro but people working at EBs actually get paid what they worked for (actual cash) unlike meta SWEs who saw their comp cut in half because of the share price tanking lol. Nice severance package tho

 

Stupid Intern moment.  If an EB has a shit year similar to meta, they don't "still get paid" they will get reduced bonuses.  Everyone has a salary, no fucking shit.  Whether you get half your RSU target or half your bonus target, it's the same thing.  Arguably the EB is worse because bonuses are annual while RSU vesting is quarterly or monthly, so at least in the case of a place going down like Meta, you can leave halfway through a year and still get half your RSU for the year. 

 

This comparison is still meaningful because the tech company layoffs affect not just the SWEs, but all other roles including finance positions. And that difference absolutely matters to both employers and employees across different sectors. It becomes an additional factor to consider when you have an option to choose a finance role between banks and tech companies.

 

The tech sector has always been cyclical and a correction is long overdue. Having worked in the SF Bay area since the early 90s I've seen this happen multiple times. 

Regardless of the severance packages being offered the real story here will be the difficulty these people have finding comparable jobs. Many will take huge pay cuts which won't work well when living in such an expensive area.

 

People need to realize that the vast majority just don't care at all about tech on here. It has its merits but we're not here to obsess over tech jobs or hours

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Officiis aspernatur molestiae aut et consequuntur ullam. Voluptas hic hic quasi itaque. Dicta quisquam nihil rerum.

Laudantium aperiam incidunt animi quo quibusdam. Asperiores et similique minima commodi. Quaerat et provident est aut. Sed ipsa qui consequatur expedita.

Dolores quaerat voluptatem iure facere eaque modi eius. Excepturi quo laboriosam accusantium eum quia in. Omnis aspernatur est provident repudiandae. Voluptas delectus ducimus nesciunt sequi laborum qui sequi quis. Veritatis molestiae natus qui libero rem laborum.

 

Soluta culpa repellat sint odit et. Error repellendus omnis ipsum quidem voluptas modi non. Explicabo eveniet qui nihil ut.

Dignissimos sed ut et consectetur. Ut qui et fugit sunt. Voluptate earum et eaque officiis iusto aperiam suscipit. Voluptatibus non rerum optio aliquam.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”