Financial Model Interview Round

Hi all, just finished an interview round and was stumped by the following.

For this round, the general skeleton of the financial model was provided and we just had to fill up and link everything. Let's assume a forecast period of 2023E - 2028E. The different schedules and 3FS were fine till I got to the valuation portion, where we had to calculate the WACC.

Even though we were provided the cost of debt and the various components to calculate cost of equity (ie. beta, risk free rate and so on), I was a bit confused as to what capital structure to use as my weights for debt/equity; do I:

1) Use the current capital structure (book value of equity and debt at the end of 2022 from the balance sheet), or; 2) Use the capital structure at the end of the forecast period (balance sheet values at the end of 2028).

From the skeleton provided, it looked like they only wanted us to calculate one WACC value and not use a different one every year.

Another issue was they did not provide any market values and we only have the balance sheet. Book value of debt is simple to retrieve, but for book value of equity, do I just use share capital or do I also have to add other equity accounts (ie. retained earnings)?

Thank you!

2 Comments
 
  1. Capital Structure: You're looking for the co's target capital structure. If it isn't explicitly stated, use the end-of-forecast period weights. 
  2. Only use one WACC, only PhD's use varying WACC values.
  3. Always use market values where you can. In this case, you said they gave you the inputs for market value of equity, so do not use book value. I would assume they also gave you the co's market cap, in which case that's your equity value. For debt, it's common in banking to use book value, it isn't scalable to individually value each bond, and you likely didn't get all the inputs you would need to calc it anyways.

Hope that helps, happy to chat further on it.

 

Corrupti rem quasi quasi recusandae. Cupiditate non quo minima placeat corrupti animi non et. Aut illum distinctio molestiae culpa maiores.

Laboriosam voluptate voluptatem ut natus iusto consectetur. Pariatur at aspernatur id.

Repudiandae a voluptatem vitae occaecati eaque error. Temporibus quia non dignissimos voluptatibus alias vero perferendis odio. Repellat sint cum quis. Consequatur laboriosam veniam officiis molestiae sint quos velit.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 04 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (17) $409
  • Associates (58) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”