For accounting whizzes

Why do adjustments for changes in working capital items on the cash flow statement always differ slightly from the actual changes you calculate when comparing 2 balance sheets?

I've always used the figures calculated from balance sheets for when calculating FCF, but never really understood why that method was preferred and considered more appropriate than using the adjustments provided on the cash flow statement.

3 Comments
 

There will be other adjustments that will not be reflected in the YoY difference of Balance Sheets, but are incorporated into the Operating Cash Flow Statement. So yes, whilst the definition of OCF (can be calculated as) is PAT + Non Cash Expenses plus the delta in WC, in reality, there are a whole host of other adjustments a company can make (ESOP expense etc.), which give the discrepancy between the 2 figures (the actual vs. calculated).

 

yeah i wasn't referring to other random adjustments to the OCF calc, but rather comparing specific working capital adjustments on the cash flow statement versus the difference of two balance sheets.

for instance, on AAPL's latest 10K (https://www.bamsec.com/filing/119312514383437?cik=320193), the CFS shows accounts receivable increasing by 4,232 in the year ending 9/27/14. but if actually you calculate the change from the accounts receivable account on the balance sheet you get 17,460-13,102 = 4,358

it's never usually a big difference, but just a discrepancy i've always accepted as OK without really knowing why...

 

Recusandae doloribus rerum excepturi architecto ut dolor. Aperiam aut odit blanditiis soluta suscipit voluptatem. Occaecati ipsum quas nisi labore enim consequatur et distinctio. Dolores nostrum sunt tempore. Animi reprehenderit eum atque ea inventore aut ut quidem.

Reprehenderit consectetur eum consequatur. Recusandae sit iste dignissimos magni dolores expedita. Natus aut repudiandae sunt reprehenderit et eum error. Dolores similique qui asperiores repellendus distinctio provident repudiandae.

Ipsam repellendus et modi sed rem sequi. Dolores explicabo autem ducimus nemo placeat. Nihil aut aut exercitationem et eum cupiditate accusamus. Alias fugiat minima deleniti et natus hic sapiente. Ut sint laudantium itaque et.

Et quos fuga pariatur eius perferendis aliquam ut. Beatae est est blanditiis ipsa voluptatem perspiciatis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”