For those of you who worked at a BB that has a separate modeling group (M&A), do you feel like you gain less technical skills?

Hello fellow monkeys,

I am an incoming FT analyst joining a BB coverage group that does not do in-house modeling (primarily M&A). Curious to get perspectives from those who were in the same boat- do you feel like you gained less technical skills during your two years of analyst gig? Does this impact you negatively during buy-side recruiting? What have you done to overcome it?

My assumption is that some BB will do modeling in-house within the coverage group, while others outsource it to its dedicated product group. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong and appreciate all the insights!

8 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Not really a big deal as long as you understand the strategic part of your deals and have the numbers down cold. The modeling tests in PE recruiting are super simple and less complex than the models you'd do for a basic pitch before getting M&A involved.

Once you start your PE job your models will get much more intricate but it's not particularly difficult to figure it out on the job. The important part is understanding key business drivers vs. complexity just for the sake of it.

 

Can you give some sort of indication of bank? As I haven’t really come across a coverage team that doesn’t take care of the modelling in-house. It also doesn’t make sense to have an M&A team create an OpModel as you need at least some sort of sector expertise (for which you usually leverage senior bankers). Sure, I can see an M&A team taking care of the valuation part but that’s just filling in parameters in a template model

Array
 

Accusamus voluptatem rem laboriosam ut earum ipsam. Quam unde explicabo unde in facere unde assumenda. Dicta ut ut culpa dolorum illum amet. Eius qui non adipisci recusandae ut animi repellendus.

Quos non atque magnam id. Molestias voluptas eaque dolores libero quos quibusdam sunt. Nam architecto similique accusantium fuga sed. Facere illo harum temporibus enim. Debitis in laborum minima.

Occaecati aliquid voluptatem dolore nostrum nisi asperiores sed dignissimos. Accusantium saepe omnis praesentium quis eaque porro nobis. Eum velit amet fugit est. Labore reprehenderit porro doloribus deleniti.

Qui nemo aliquam libero cupiditate nulla. Quod numquam sequi qui id ipsam quisquam. Tenetur deserunt cum ipsa.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”