Glencore: Goldman's worst nightmare?

Interesting article on business insider about how Goldman is freaked out about the Volcker rule. Specifically, they're scared of Glencore and the threat it poses to their commodities business. Goldman is one of the 3 big BB commodities players, along with Morgan Stanley and Barclays. Because Glencore is not regulated, it can do whatever it wants with regards to leverage, prop, and compensation.

This seems to confirm Midas' post yesterday on the big commodity players.

The Real Reason Goldman Should Be Freaking

 

Was reading the article before. There is a fundamental difference between the two though. While Glencore is maybe the largest commodities trader int he world, they deal with physical commodity trading and logistics, also production as well now. Although Goldman does deal with both physical trading and logistics (sometimes) it's in less risky environments, and a major portion of Goldman's activities come from commodity linked securities, where they provide risk management for clients. I think this ipo scares Goldman because glencore is going to use its position to be a player across the commodities supply chain, more so now starting with production and be aggressive in Goldman's specialty, which is securities. Before there was glencore dealing with the risky stuff and the end customers were bb's and their clients and the major oil companies. with the ipo and if acquisitions go accroding to plan, glencore will dig it out of the ground and be able to get it to the end customer without anyone else in the middle

 

Still think it is a terrible idea for Glencore to go public. They make a ton of money doing shady shit, and now that's going to be out there for everyone to see. Raping Africa's natural resources and various other shady activities are going to get a lot more attention from regulators and the public.

As they say: If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

 
porkbellies:
Still think it is a terrible idea for Glencore to go public. They make a ton of money doing shady shit, and now that's going to be out there for everyone to see. Raping Africa's natural resources and various other shady activities are going to get a lot more attention from regulators and the public.

As they say: If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

i tend to agree

 
porkbellies:
Still think it is a terrible idea for Glencore to go public. They make a ton of money doing shady shit, and now that's going to be out there for everyone to see. Raping Africa's natural resources and various other shady activities are going to get a lot more attention from regulators and the public.

As they say: If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

So basically you are a shady character that is ok with shady business. Do you work at goldman sachs?

"The higher up the mountain, the more treacherous the path" -Frank Underwood
 

I think it means they think top in commodities will come in the next few years. They not actually cashing out at all right now. Just giving themselves the option to do so slowly and eventually.

 

On the flip side glencore hone reason for the ipo is to buy up more assets. Would be strange to buy more exposure if they thought it was all about to collapse. Or is my logic flawed?

Monty what makes you so sure beyond 10 yrs say?

 

trafigura, vitol.....with regards to commodity peak, whether it stays here or goes up or down everyone needs the products these guys are selling. it seems they think its going up given their plan to acquire assets across the world. natural resources are the most fundamental input in economics, and its non renewable. one of the dynamics which drives prices are one emerging markets and inflation, also there are no new large deposits being found across the world, whether it be oil or copper, even gold.

 

Nice to see the world wake up overnight to the Glencore story. That said I have heard no version of Dodd-Frank to date that says put "us based banks" at a disadvantage. Goldman also has physical assets in some markets and for sure will be fighting for "end-user" and "non-bank swaps dealer" vs the uber tough "bank swaps dealer" designation.

Glencore did not just show-up overnight either. For instance in global physical oil/products trading, Glencore competes with the banks, oil majors, nationalized oil companies, independents (see above) everyday.

 

It's important to note that Glasenberg and the other BSDs at Glencore have a 5 year sell restriction on their new shares. Goldman, MS, Barclays, DB or anyone with a decent size book could be in a lot of pain. Glencore is definitely in the financial game too, mostly OTC. Who knows how deep the rabbit hole goes? I was dumbfounded when I heard about the IPO. That walk-in closet has skeletons piled up to the ceiling. All I know is, I'd love to go to sleep knowing that when I woke up you could tag $10B onto my net-worth.

 
Best Response
Brady4MVP:
On a whim I decided to submit my resume for the direct entry deals desk role at the Stamford office of Trafigura. I submitted the resume at 1:20 AM central time and got a rejection at 1:53 AM! Talk about efficiency!
Holy shit
barboon:
porkbellies:
As they say: If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
So basically you are a shady character that is ok with shady business. Do you work at goldman sachs?
This company is in the same category of shady as XE or the CIA, possibly worse, as the justification is money as opposed to national security....it puts GS to shame, hands down.

I too am curious to know how they are going to get around all of the changes to the regulatory systems over there. I guess if you sit at the historical nexus of shady financial transactions, it's probably the best place to take such a company public....they know where all of the bodies are buried and who to bribe to keep their mouth shut.

Get busy living
 
Brady4MVP:
On a whim I decided to submit my resume for the direct entry deals desk role at the Stamford office of Trafigura. I submitted the resume at 1:20 AM central time and got a rejection at 1:53 AM! Talk about efficiency!

My guess is I had too much experience for this role since it is an entry level position geared towards recent grads.

BP does the same. Most european firms have a script screener if you don't hit 80% of the keywords or criteria. No human see's your resume.

 

I don't think it signals a peak in commodities. Players like this love volatility in the markets. Prices going up can be good. Prices going down can be good (except for the producer end). But all in all, the physical marketers are less dependent on absolute price, more so on differentials (product differentials such as light vs heavy oil, ngls vs spec, location differentials, etc.)

 

I recently read an article that mentioned one of the reasons they're going public (other than partners cashing out) is to add more transparency to the company that will hopefully attract customers who are withholding business because they do "shady shit".

The % factor is negligible when comparing to GS, MS, Barcap etc. because those firms are participating in a rather efficient futures/forward exchange so the profits are pretty tight.

Actually delivery of commodities in connection with a futures/forward market (not to mention currency arbitrage) is wildly more inefficient so the profits will be way higher if you're good at it (which evidently Glencore is).

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw
 

Possimus aliquam aut quo reprehenderit. Eveniet harum consequatur ut occaecati vitae quasi reprehenderit inventore.

Rerum dolore sit ipsam fugit quo sequi et. Natus dolore aliquid eaque. Reiciendis incidunt nisi quibusdam et ipsum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”