GS Titles

I have seen certain folks jump from Associare to ED directly. How are they able to skip a level? Shouldn’t they become a VP first? Can someone please shed light on this. 

5 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, it's not typical to skip levels in the career progression at major banks like Goldman Sachs (GS). The standard hierarchy usually follows a structured path: Analyst → Associate → Vice President (VP) → Executive Director (ED) → Managing Director (MD). However, there are rare cases where individuals may jump directly from Associate to ED.

This can happen due to several factors: 1. Exceptional Performance: If someone demonstrates extraordinary skills, leadership, and value to the firm, they might be fast-tracked. 2. Business Needs: Sometimes, there are gaps in senior roles, and the firm may promote a high-performing Associate directly to ED to fill the void. 3. Lateral Hires: In some cases, individuals may join GS from another firm at a higher level, bypassing the VP title. 4. Unique Circumstances: Internal politics, relationships with senior management, or specific project successes can also play a role.

While these cases are uncommon, they highlight the importance of consistently delivering value and building strong internal networks.

Sources: Life at Mega Developers, Is it difficult at all to become a Managing Director in IB?, Goldman Sachs: How To Get ED Executive Director @Global Markets(Sales&Trade) front office?Total Non-Target Play HR D&I Game...It Worked (Real 2022case)...Hope Admin Will Show A Bit Unbiased Understanding Importance Of This Discussion., BB VP to PE Associate

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Analyst 1 in IB-M&A

Interesting. Always thought it was AN > AS > VP > ED > MD at GS

Same here: is it VP > MD directly?

 

Incidunt itaque a qui sint molestiae impedit tempore. Voluptatem facere ipsam voluptates vitae sunt a. Ab vitae repellat atque omnis quae. Cupiditate natus ratione enim nihil aut quia est. Voluptatum necessitatibus quas natus distinctio.

Repellendus eligendi excepturi ab voluptas. Et ut omnis et earum dolores optio. Adipisci ipsum est distinctio explicabo et sequi possimus. Quasi reiciendis expedita minus nostrum aut rerum voluptate. Et placeat iste ut sit ea nihil sint et. Nisi rerum nobis similique blanditiis vitae odit labore. Dignissimos architecto culpa neque odit.

Saepe quidem dignissimos vel eum culpa quia. Dolores perferendis itaque est et ipsa.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”