Help with technical question please

Hello,

Can anyone please confirm if my thought process for following questions is correct or not.

  1. What is the largest contributor to EBITDA of a Utility company ?
    Ans. Depreciation. Typically, Utility companies have significant CAPEX and incur high depreciation expense.

  2. If two companies have same margin, growth and risk, then how can they have different EV/EBITDA multiple ?
    Ans. Assuming both companies have same net income (earnings), then company with higher depreciation will have higher EBITDA and a lower EV/EBITDA multiple.

I would really appreciate your feedback.

 
Best Response

My view on the 2nd question: you're on the right track, but I would rephrase the answer to address capex instead of depreciation, which is a mostly accounting metric (the key here is to address why, on an intuitive level, companies might be valued differently). The intuition is one company may have a lower capex profile generating the same amount of growth, implying a higher ROIC and therefore some sort of competitive advantage. Thus, the company with lower capex will trade at a higher multiple, with higher real cash flow - but if we normalize the multiple to an EV/(EBITDA - capex) basis, they might be closer/the same.

Another potential answer could be taxes, but there may be some double counting if that's already reflected in your discount rate (aka whether or not you believe WACC is a good proxy for risk - I don't).

 

Sed ratione dolorem distinctio et aut. Incidunt cupiditate eveniet assumenda ut natus. Doloremque deleniti optio molestias non. Recusandae asperiores ut rerum fugit et eius.

Ut quisquam est autem praesentium facilis repudiandae maiores. Id tempora id dolore in sint nemo. Corporis nisi non eum sit et sed eius. Voluptas totam omnis nobis sunt explicabo ea. Est non et non maxime fugiat. Ut sed est nisi sit consequuntur placeat pariatur.

Minus molestias suscipit ipsam quas ut illo sunt enim. Deleniti eligendi earum deserunt ut dolorem. Repellat modi inventore possimus est. Nihil id enim voluptas quod aperiam nihil ipsa. Omnis possimus placeat distinctio esse. Iusto et dolore non veniam sunt.

Facilis maxime ratione velit est provident. Expedita a quasi vero culpa nam. Recusandae omnis cumque provident quibusdam eum voluptas ea.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 01 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 97.7%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 06 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (206) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (148) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”