Historical BS not tying with Historical CF

So this is what's happening: AR in 2020 = 5 AR in 2021 = 3 Change in AR on the CF = 4

I'm doing a case study for a publicly traded company, and I know the disconnect is due to acquisitions, and there's no feasible way to reconcile it.

So now, I'm not sure if I should say screw it and use the historical CF or do the calculation myself. Thanks in advance.

5 Comments
 

In my experience historical CF and BS never reconcile properly. Most people that look at public companies input historicals as they report them or hardcode, for example, the reported operating CF and use the "other" line as a plug to make up the difference

 

Intern in IB-M&A:

In my experience historical CF and BS never reconcile properly. Most people that look at public companies input historicals as they report them or hardcode, for example, the reported operating CF and use the "other" line as a plug to make up the difference

The audit should tie out tho and if it doesn’t you can usually tell why by the footnotes

 

Could you clarify, are you saying I should manually calculate the Cash Flow an then add a line item called "other" that reconciles the difference between Historical CF and the manually calculated CF?

I don't think the firm I'm doing a case study for would approve of that unfortunately...

 

Typically don’t reconcile due to rounding. Just hard code it or adjust via new line item like above comment. 

 

Ut nobis dolores omnis quae optio. Impedit impedit voluptatem dolore nostrum atque a. Illum dicta ex ea voluptas.

Labore a iste deleniti quibusdam accusamus eius. Omnis totam et voluptatibus est. Tempore enim nihil qui sint ea sed ea. Qui dolore nemo commodi quae ea delectus tempore dolores.

Hic sit aspernatur architecto unde. Repellendus optio ipsum odio molestias ipsum vel nihil. Et voluptas facilis possimus. Pariatur molestiae sunt praesentium et. Nam consequatur voluptates laudantium et. Dolorem nemo fugiat est nulla mollitia odio deserunt. Vero ratione velit maxime velit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”