How do you differentiate your answers?

I had a question about differentiating answers to technical questions. I have a first-round interview coming up for a firm and from people who have already taken the interview, I have been told that it'll be completely technical.

Knowing this and the fact that there won't be more than a couple of behavioral questions, how can I differentiate my answers to successfully move on to the next round?

5 Comments
 
Most Helpful

The most basic level of understanding is “what”. Anyone can look up and memorize a definition, a formula, or a ratio. The next level is “how”, but just because you can explain how something works doesn’t exactly set you apart either.

I really think when someone can explain “why”, it really shows their understanding. WHY do we make this calculation? WHY this formula gives us a good picture of x and not y? WHY an alternative measure will not work in this particular case? Being able to explain the intuition and reasoning behind each answer shows you truly understand the material.

A few more tips:

  • Use as few words to cover as much material as possible.
  • Think top down. Give the large picture first, and an interviewer an always dive deeper into your response. if you start rambling since the beginning, you’ll lose them quickly.
  • When I interviewed, I was asked “How would you explain IRR to your grandma?” Again, if you just use the definitions, this wouldn’t have worked. If you can break down a difficult concept into simple terms, that shows you truly understand it.
  • When applicable, use an example to demonstrate you understand the intuition and/or application.
  • Try to avoid getting in trouble by mentioning something tangential just for the sake of showing that you know the term. The interviewer may drill deeper into any part of your answer.
 

I may be misunderstanding you, but I'm confused when I should "use as few words" as possible vs. trying to explain the "why."

For example, I had an interview lately in which I was asked "what are the main valuation methods" as well as "what are the tranches of debt"? I just said the answers without going into the "why." (10 seconds or less per question). My expectation is that if the interviewer wants to test my knowledge, they would just ask follow up questions.

Could this have been misinterpreted as me not knowing the concepts?

 

I'd say for simple technicals like those, you should stick with the textbook answers unless they follow-up. I think LCinCRE's advice is more applicable when you are walking through a transaction and pitching a stock for example. Here, you don't want to just say, DCF gave me x, Comps gave me x, etc. You can really stand out here by giving the "why" to each of the methods you used.

For example, when I talk about the LBO I built for the buyside advisory transaction I completed, I preface it by saying, "Given the strong secular growth drivers and consistent cash flow generation of the business in addition to the lack of reasonable strategic bidders, we expected a high level of competition from private equity buyers. Therefore, we focused on building an LBO model assuming a 20-25% target IRR to determine what private equity bidders would bid, so that we could lock them out in the first round bid"

 

Nulla repellat ipsum nesciunt nisi aut minima cupiditate. Vel asperiores quidem sit sunt quam neque. Perspiciatis doloremque similique sit id error accusamus. Necessitatibus omnis perspiciatis dolores ullam maxime a quo pariatur. Inventore perspiciatis qui neque labore ducimus quaerat voluptatem laudantium. Unde placeat provident unde impedit quae.

Aut eos nobis et odio eveniet. Nobis quo doloribus ut maxime. Modi officiis et laborum.

Est officiis rerum explicabo aut dolor et repellat quaerat. Rerum amet aut corrupti exercitationem earum. Qui itaque dicta iste pariatur. Facilis laborum excepturi voluptatibus sed voluptas aperiam. Neque fugiat delectus aut voluptates dolor. Voluptate delectus quod non nihil.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”