How hard is FT recruiting compared to regular SA recruiting?

Question in Title. Went through SA recruiting where I was able to network well and get around 11 R1s and several SDs. Ended up not doing well in the SDs (mostly because i didn't prep enough w upperclassmen & analysts) but was able to sign an alright MM with good volume just smaller deals.

Want to FT recruit for job security and also to move to a better firm if possible. Curious how hard it is compared to SA recruiting (esp given my success/lack of success)

16 Comments
 

Harder and easier. Harder, because the actual number of seats is far fewer. Easier, because the candidate pool is typically weaker, so it's easier to stand out. 

My own view watching others get in on FT recruiting is that the best people who did so usually have a story about why FT recruiting is for them. I found a good number of CS/premed switchers did quite well actually. They're smart enough and usually have a good reason as to why they wanted to come to finance. 

So try to have something that makes you stand out more. 

 

How is the candidate pool weaker? Shouldn’t it be harder, given most people received return offers and were at an ib? SA recruiting are candidates of the same level

 

Well, you answered the question yourself. The people gunning for it the hardest got their return offers, and are removed from the pool. Most people don't go through FT if they have a return offer, just not worth it. 

IME, most FT recruiting comes from one of the following

-Got IB internship, didn't get RO

-Got finance internship lower than IB, wants to do IB

-Completely different field, looking to switch into finance. 

That would be the majority of candidates. At least ones you'd even bother to look at, there are of course some with no internships or experience who have an idea they can walk in. 

So standing out there means having something that puts you in the top of each pile. 

 

i assumed a lot of FT recruiting was people from lower tier IBs who got their return offers but want to move to a better IB. Thats where the best of the best are competing against each other.

also ive heard no RO means ur screwed

 
Most Helpful

Yea same. I thought that if you don't have a strong story as to why you didn't receive a return offer, or if you didn't have a SA at an IB, it's hard to get a FT offer. Not only is getting interviews harder, but I'm pretty sure that the bar and level of competition is higher, especially because most candidates are trying to lateral. I heard being at an IB for SA and getting a return offer gives you a huge advantage over kids who weren't in an IB or had a return offer. Please let me know if you heard something different @usernameladiesman217.

 

This is not very applicable to all banks, I’m speaking from a London point of view here:

I did a IB summer at a very strong mid-market, I ended up getting the return offer but I wanted to fish for a ‘better’ bank so I only went for EB / BB.

For the 3 EB and BB I got to the AC for, they only let people with summer return offers into the AC’s. You’re fighting for a very small number of seats with very tough competition that are all able to perform well on the job to get a return offer from their IB or similar industry. I’d say if you were recruiting for mid-markets then perhaps you’ll come across less strong competition but then again, the number of seats is also very small.

Also, the level of technicality in the interviews is definitely a huge step up from summers. Since the number of seats is lower as well, they are much more picky with who they pick.

 

completely agree with this, I def had a wrong idea of my prep thinking i was fine. At this point I have a better guage for SA recruiting but what would FT recruiting focus more on?

 

I'll answer this best as I can as I just went through the past cycle and went through three processes and accepted at one of them.

I interned in FP&A at a major F500 for reference so I came in through the cycle with no SA at a major bank although I had an internship at a regional boutique my sophomore summer and also had my technicals sharp already from prepping throughout college.

I'd say compared to summer analyst recruiting, full time recruiting is much harder due to the following:

  • Less seats – in my experience I submitted a plethora of apps I saw that were posted for FT roles at banks and through networking, basically every single one was hiring only one analyst for the group due to it being determined that the respective intern would not be offered FT or later after interns were out, the seat was open for whatever reason (no RO again or intern rejected or reneged).
  • This is my personally my experience, but it was definitely a lot more drilling on technicals. I was asked just a laundry list of questions back-to-back.
  • A lot of drilling on the space itself. I think this is something that will be more unique to a FT role you're in process for rather than a generalist pool of SA spots. For example, if it's a FT role for DCM, it will be a lot of questions that go off-guide about the space. If it's TMT, it'll be a lot of questions to sniff out if you actually know the space. The nicher the group, the more they'll drill you in my experience. 
  • Above, I mentioned how overwhelming technical it gets but for both processes I went through, near the end there were still a bunch of rounds that served no purpose other than to purely gauge culture fit. I wouldn't necessarily consider this a "hard factor" of FT recruiting, but it's a good to know if you believe you will be recruiting through FT. Additionally, this can depend from bank to bank obviously, but from what I can gather, I just think since you're working there indefinitely, they really want to sniff out you're not a robot.
  • Similar to above – but just to list it separately, the processes were a lot longer. Felt mentally draining and had cortisol at all time high levels during recruiting but blessed to have made it through with one bank. Bank I accepted at was 6 rounds, another went through to 4 before I cut, and the one I made it only past first round, a mutual from another school got which I found out was also around 5 rounds.
 

Sit quia ut et aliquid dolor mollitia. Possimus quisquam impedit sed sed fugiat. Dolor et et aut veritatis ea dolor. Aspernatur id non tempora.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”