How much do looks matter in sellside?

Rising college junior here, most of the kids at my school (hypertarget, think WYD/Oxbridge/LSE) who landed offers in the past couple years were (very) conventionally attractive, with >90% of the kids being caucasian and the females noticeably slender and on the tall side (>5'9) and oftentimes blonde, with the men disproportionately gym/frat bros who are over 6'. Kids of both gender who landed offers were also mostly athletes (around 2/3). 
 

Considering that I am an African-American (half Rhodesian, half Welsh) male who is 5'6 and have horrible acne and a lazy eye, would this make breaking in significantly harder, or am I overthinking things?

23 Comments
 

My father's side of the family always referred to themselves as Rhodesian and modern-day Zimbabwe (in addition to some regions of South Africa) as Rhodesia.

 
Most Helpful

Honestly before somebody calls this a stupid question I truly believe being conventionally attractive is a MASSIVE benefit to men (and especially women) in all facets of life. Something tells me if you were able to rank people on attractiveness objectively, those that score highly are way more likely to be considered a good "fit" or more "polished" even if the personalities were all the same. 

My armchair social psychologist theory on this is that at early ages those who are athletic and good looking tend to lump together and become the cool kids on the playground. This leads to the development of superior leadership traits and confidence and follows them throughout life, even into their late careers. Just my $0.02. 

 

To clarify, I am not trolling or joking.

But, I know some companies (both in finance and outside of finance) purposely don't hire very attractive females, especially if they are young. The people I spoke to tend to share a similar rationale along the lines of females that are too attractive may cause problems (distraction) in the workplace. They are more likely to get a better offer from another company, as they generally have more opportunities. Also, they will likely eventually get married and have children. And, the truth is, not all women/mom's want to be both a career woman and a mother. So, they may not stay on if that happens. An attractive female is more likely going to get hitched than someone not attractive.

When I asked about this thinking, someone explained that someone unattractive has probably had less opportunities in the past, and so their job is more likely to mean more to them, than to someone attractive (who has always had life easier), so they are more likely to cherish the opportunity and work hard. They should also be less likely to leave, which helps with employee retention.

But, also, to caveat this is that none of people that I spoke to, whom employ this kind of thinking, were hiring for sales roles. They were all hiring for analytical, ops, finance type roles.

I don't know if I agree with this thinking, but some people approach their female hires with this approach. No joke.

 

But, also, to caveat this is that none of people that I spoke to, whom employ this kind of thinking, were hiring for sales roles. They were all hiring for analytical, ops, finance type roles.

Finance type roles, meaning IB?

 

Might be the case in the US but defo not in the UK. Seen some complete munters landing offers from some of the schools you have mentioned. That being said, I have never come across anyone fat in banking. A lot of ugly ducklings tho. 

 

Modi recusandae suscipit illo eum aut minima. Quia dolores quaerat rem et. Voluptates reprehenderit fugit sunt.

 

Occaecati voluptates reiciendis ullam qui molestiae non omnis. Laborum sit sint incidunt minima natus et et.

Minima necessitatibus perspiciatis sunt exercitationem cupiditate cum. Laudantium delectus soluta et voluptates.

Fugiat esse eaque aut eum debitis. Cupiditate doloremque in fuga sed quasi quidem a. Dicta accusamus quia neque est aut. Asperiores rem quidem reiciendis maiores est quo distinctio quia. Et harum ut architecto voluptatum placeat sint qui. Adipisci nihil atque numquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan No 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”