How technically correct is this?
I say it's wrong because the stock has no future cash flows and thus no intrinsic value. Even if going by comps, value is zero.
But then he's not arguing about the intrinsic value, he's just sayin it's priced at £50.
And the 'valuation advisor' too. Wtf?
Est recusandae excepturi animi consequatur et accusamus ex. Vitae delectus eaque ut ea ut sapiente omnis. Veniam dicta vel voluptates voluptatibus quas. Enim est neque ad nisi. Velit ab earum sunt magni vitae nihil accusantium. Veritatis harum eum commodi corrupti.
Velit consequatur sit et quo voluptas. Facere quis sit distinctio fugit at repellendus maiores. Magnam ad autem quisquam magni perferendis porro eos accusantium.
Ut exercitationem quo aspernatur tempore et. Voluptates quaerat ut debitis quaerat. Cumque doloremque officiis deleniti quae aut modi delectus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...