How technically correct is this?
I say it's wrong because the stock has no future cash flows and thus no intrinsic value. Even if going by comps, value is zero.
But then he's not arguing about the intrinsic value, he's just sayin it's priced at £50.
And the 'valuation advisor' too. Wtf?
Earum doloribus cum distinctio excepturi. Nam provident itaque consequatur vitae incidunt nulla voluptas consectetur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...