How to Escape Bottom Bucket
Title says it all, say hypothetically you get placed bottom bucket. Outside of incorporating feedback from your review and taking it to heart, how can you escape the bottom bucket? It feels like a downward spiral since you start getting worse and worse staffings and kind of traps you as the go to "bad" analyst.
Curious if you guys have any advice or real world experience with this.
The trick is to stop making careless mistakes and to only make mistakes once. There are many threads on WSO about this, so take a look. Here are some of my own tips:
Read The Checklist Manifesto by Atul Gawande (this is one of those books worth buying). Sounds silly, but start creating checklists for all of your work. This will help you avoid missing a footnote, forgetting to use your bank's shade of blue of slide 24, etc.
Print out and read everything twice.
Before starting any assignment, even somethig as mundane as spreading comps, ask yourself, "why am I doing this?" Understanding why you are working on what you are working on will help you catch silly mistakes and ask better questions.
Speaking of which....ALWAYS ask questions. I had an SVP when I was in IB who would interrupt MDs, clients, everyone constantly to ask questions. The guy was easily one of the smartest people I ever worked with. If you don't understand something, ask!!!!
Take an active interest in your work. If you hate IB, leave. You will never get out of this rut if you're 100% in it for the money. You do need to find the work at least somewhat interesting.
Hey Sil spot on and helpful, as always. Some advice given to me that I would add: - when writing (a deck, IM, even an email) always think: "so what?" - be concise and thoughtful - ask questions. Many analysts think they would look stupid by asking and rather try to figure it out on the run. Don't. - in addition to printing work (in colour), take your HP19BII or whatever pocket calculator you have, and check basic lines and kpis of the printed work. Chances are your MD will. - always try to do a back of the envelope calculation of your model. Help you condense the key drivers, double check your complex model and articulate in a few steps your reasoning (valuation, accretion/dilution or whatever work in excel). Simple is beauty and if you can think and show this straight, chances are you get recognised by client, MD, VP or else people, who will not deep dive in the complexity of the model. You'll also be thankful to catch potentially serious mistakes. - as many already mentioned: own your work, own your mistakes and own your decision (including why you are doing this). Good luck, keep us posted how it evolves!
Sil covered a lot, which is good. Here to add a few more tips / comments. A lot of these kind of overlap with eachothers, but hopefully this is helpful to people:
While the two above posts provide a great road map of what to do to not be ranked bottom bucket, I'm not sure they are really answering the question. The concern more lies in perception and changing said perception, which goes beyond merely doing the right things.
Basically, once you know your bottom bucket and that you do in fact want to change and will do whatever it takes, especially the bullets outlined ahead, you're going to really need to be proactive in communicating your goals to become a top analyst. Likely, you'll need to prove yourself with lower level stuff but as time goes on, and assuming no mistakes, you will need to seek out more important work. You might want to have more informal check ups with your staffers, etc. as you make progress. Not only will this make sure you are progressing but it will also force them to be aware of your progression and facilitate being put on more complex projects.
If you merely sit back and do the right things without actively engaging the perception change will take a lot longer, if at all.
Plenty of tips here on how to be a solid Analyst, but I would add that before all of that you have to first carefully consider: Do you belong in the bottom bucket? There are plenty of people in banking (in any industry, for that matter) who actually just are not cut out for that industry, and if that is the case for you then you should be thinking of other options instead of trying to be better at something you are not going to stick with anyway.
There isn't any shame in it, either. This forum probably would not be the most sympathetic to a bottom bucket analyst, but if you're there more because you hate numbers/can't function on less than 8 hours of sleep/have a debilitating health issue and less because you can't do basic arithmetic/just don't even bother/are a complete asshole, that's fine. Just pack up and move on, no big deal.
So I moved from a get shit done trading desk into IB...a couple of months in my staffer sat me down and said “your job is not about efficiency, effort and productivity, which you do, it’s about making my life easier for me.” For a variety of reasons he was right - in a lot of ways I was great, but I tried to translate productivity into banking, which it doesn’t. On a desk I was judged by P&L which is all my bosses cared about. You gloss over a lot of nonsense in that environment, but you don’t need to anticipate the needs of your superiors and what they might need down the road.
That conversation changed my entire approach to work. If everything I do makes my boss look better and more prepared, I will do well. That doesn’t mean you can’t push back, but it’s in the lense of what is best for your team.
The problem is that I now judge my employees by that mantra who haven’t heard that conversation (unless they are f’ing up).