IB group sweatiness tiers

We all know some banks are sweatier than others… what about groups? What makes some groups sweatier than others? Proposed list below, would love to hear others thoughts:

Tier 1: Sweaty

  • Energy & Power, Financial Institutions: General “old school”, backwards looking clientele and traditional senior bankers, which trickles down
  • M&A: Constantly working on high pressure live deals, typically a big milestone in a client’s history which makes for a sweaty experience 

    Tier 2: Moderate Sweatiness / YMMV
  • Industrials, HC: Large universe of potential clients to pitch to, fragmented market share means most industrials/ HC groups across the street are at least somewhat sweaty
  • TMT: Large universe but more concentrated towards the few top players & top banks. Generally sweaty at the higher prestige banks (GS, boutiques etc) and on the lighter side at lower tier banks
  • LevFin: can be sweaty at the top balance sheet banks (JPM), less sweaty elsewhere 

    Tier 3: Least Sweaty

  • Consumer, REGAL: Newer school clientele, typically care more about marketing/visuals vs technicals, slower sectors the past few years
  • ECM: generally not sweaty in terms of hours in the office (unless the public equity markers are absolutely ripping like 2021), juniors generally copy/paste market data and the value lies with seniors ability to place paper

    Thoughts?
     

19 Comments
 

There's almost no bank where TMT is more sweaty than Energy/PU&I. Energy/PU&I is sweat central, as is FIG.

 

M&T is way more sweaty than pure tech usually due to telecom being more modeling-intensive. Tech is either very sweaty if in a top like ~10 bank in the space or very chill if not. Tech is the space with the largest variance. Telecom, particularly, digital telecom stuff, gets extremely sweaty. Industrials are always sweaty just due to their varied nature; it's sweaty across cycles since some industrial subsectors are more cyclical than others. Industrial also gets worsened hours-wise due to the old school nature of the majority of clients, old school clients + vast universe = extreme sweat. The rest seem more or less accurate.

 

Et quas voluptatem corrupti occaecati qui et et saepe. Qui veritatis fugiat magni deserunt. Et libero consequatur nihil voluptates fuga provident quisquam dolorum. Possimus soluta totam quibusdam. Et rerum asperiores doloribus dignissimos aut non. Pariatur quidem voluptates harum molestiae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”