Investment Banks as Watch Brands

GS = Rolex

MS = AP

JP = Patek

three of the biggest in the market and everyone knows them even if they have no interest in the industry

CVP = Richard Mille

Lazard = FP Journe

Moelis / PWP = girard perregaux

PJT / Evercore = Blancpain

All competing with the top three but not known my the average Joe

Rothschild = Vacheron Constantin - Huge name in Europe, but don't get nearly as much love in the States

BofA / Citi = Panerai - Solidly placed where they are

Barclays / UBS = Omega - Playing catch-up to the top few, but still very solid in their own right. Use lower prices as incentives 

Deutsche = Hublot - Known and even admired by the common man, but memes to anyone in the industry 

Jefferies = Seiko - Consistently pushing above their weight

Mizuho = Grand Seiko - Japanese firm grabbing attention

 BNP / SocGen = Cartier - Not nessesarily primarily focused on this business activity (jewellery and commercial banking), French representation in a foreign industry

HL = Breitling - Extremely strong in one niche(RX/ Aviation), trying to build other areas

RBC / HSBC/Nomura = Bvlgari - Foreign entrants in an industry largely dominated by a single country, all also have other areas of focus

Santander = Tudor - Not relevant 10 years ago, starting to make significant moves in the market but still something to prove 

MUFG / SMBC = Swatch - Kind of meh themselves but hold stakes in some of the most prestigious in the market

FT Partners / Qatalyst = Apple Watch

CS = Cortébert - Once pretty special, now out of business


 

Absolutely not - Lange is definitely more of an EB-level watch. We're talking small volume, high quality and expensive. If we were to introduce Lange, I'd argue that it'd be at the Moelis/PWP level.

I reckon Grand Seiko or something of that nature would be more appropriate for the BofA/Citi dynamic - it's a strong-ish premium offering as a complement to a more mainstream product (i.e. a strong IB division as a complement to retail/Commercial banking). Although, Grand Seiko's range goes from Omega/Rolex competitor pieces to MB&F competitor pieces so this may not be the best direct comparison. 

 

Baird = G-Shock

Great for those in the industrials field. Not sexy but solid. Comes with full capabilities of a fancier watch without the presumptions.   

Mizuho = Galaxy Watch

Not as sexy as the American Big Tech brands, but desperately trying to pickup share in the American markets by acquiring additional features / design methods from Apple/Amazon/Google products. Supporters have been saying for years "Geez, the ______ on the new Galaxy watch is a game changer, I think it might finally take on Apple this year!" But somehow regardless of the new initiatives, the brand stays second fiddle to American Big Tech products.  

 

For the sake of a discussion;

Blancpain is the oldest surviving Swiss brand and originated the Fifty Fathoms which was an inspiration for the Rolex Submariner.

Cartier is in the top five in terms of market share and sales growth while also being a strong legacy name.

Swatch saved the Swiss watch industry and became one of the largest conglomerates.

Casio, Seiko, and Citizen aren't even on the list...
 

 

wouldnt GS be patek? it's the undisputed number 1. also disagree with CVP being RM but I see where you're coming from. 

 

So pretty low rated but with a hella strong founder and specific target market?

 

I'd say GS would be PP, MS should be AP and JPM should be VC, based on the date of founding. Like GS/MS/JP, AP/VC/PP are considered the "holy trinity" or "big 3" of their respective industry. Rolex are fantastic watchmakers, but they just can't compete with AP/VC/PP on the basis of sophistication - Rolex tend to focus on perfecting simple watches and making them fantastic, whilst AP/VC/PP do that and much more. Lazard should be Breguet, not FPJ - old, half french and high end. I'd put Rothschild here too if not for their weakness outside of europe - not sure what I'd name as a counterpart to Rothschild though, possibly Jaeger Lecoultre, in that they're fairly old guard and underappreciated outside of Europe. 

Also I reckon for the Techy banks (Qatalyst and to a lesser extent FTP) why not Urwerk given the astronomical salaries?

 

Yeah I was thinking the Big 3 of each side worked too, but if you asked someone on the street to name an investment bank it would almost certainly be MS GS JPM and a watch would be Rolex AP PP - so just thought that makes sense. VC does compete with them of course, and is probably more 'prestigious' than a Rolex  but if you're not into watches you've almost certainly never heard of them

 

I understand your reasoning - I more took the view that you were talking about them in terms of equal prestige rather than public perception - I think the whole direct holy trinity comparison works, but I respect your take on it - there's just something that feels off about GS being equated with Rolex to me. I mean an An1 can afford a sub (or at least, that used to be the case before prices when stratospheric), which kind of diminishes the relative perception of prestige, if you get what I mean?

Point taken re Vacheron's name recognition though - outside of watch circles they're somewhat unknown (although this is less arguably less appliable to Europe) and I'd attribute this to the fact that they don't really an icon or hero watch. I mean, PP have the Nautilus, AP have the Royal Oak, what do VC have, the Overseas? As far as I'm aware you can still walk into an AD and get an overseas, if not instantly then at least within 6 months, compared to the absurd waiting lists for the Nautilus and the RO. The Patrimony is pretty much the same thing as the Calatrava, but (I think) with a higher retail price. 

 

I asked ChatGPT this question:

JPM -- Rolex

GS -- Patek

MS -- AP

Evercore -- Breguet

Lazard -- Vacheron Constantin

CVP -- A. Lange & Sohne

 

Bit of a hot take (maybe) but I’d even say that Macquarie would be something like a Rolex Milgauss or an Omega Speedmaster or something. It’s got a quality base-level operation but not quite good enough to compete with the big boys worldwide, except in one niche area where they were first to market and still the best. In the case of the milgauss that’s watches for CERN, with the speedmaster that’s going to the moon, with Macquarie that’s infra.

 

Quam temporibus saepe odio fugiat quaerat architecto ipsa. Rerum possimus incidunt sit sequi ad excepturi. Perspiciatis totam similique rerum at voluptatibus ut consectetur. Harum atque et provident inventore occaecati nihil dolorem. Illum aut maxime quia excepturi autem. Amet perspiciatis odit qui.

 

Recusandae amet nulla labore aut. Vel officia non aperiam atque illo molestiae ea. Ut earum ab vitae libero nisi sequi sit sunt. Saepe corrupti vel voluptates. Excepturi fuga molestiae quaerat aspernatur quibusdam perspiciatis illum autem. Earum ut fugit eaque autem molestiae iure. Deleniti nihil magni voluptates quae ut vel cupiditate.

Cum omnis quia sed eum molestias qui. Id quia qui dicta quae. Corporis omnis excepturi ducimus tenetur.

Repellat quo aut nemo minus repellat rerum reprehenderit. Qui dolore quas voluptatem qui. Explicabo qui voluptatem nihil labore. Omnis vero et atque voluptas soluta. Nihil doloremque quibusdam dicta aut deleniti enim. Totam error ut reprehenderit officia. Cupiditate ea ut qui minima tempore nulla.

 

Ut eos earum illum odit. Rerum et odio omnis neque. Laudantium voluptatem expedita non aut.

Sed distinctio qui repellat aut deleniti harum deleniti. Sed corporis quis excepturi dolores praesentium vel. Sed iusto autem delectus aut quia minima. Dolorem eos illo excepturi itaque ipsum nihil.

Quisquam minus sequi enim natus. Perferendis provident velit aut sequi aut ducimus. Itaque hic consequatur enim ipsa aut. Velit distinctio dolores in hic pariatur laborum voluptate. Quam repellat est dolorem similique consequatur ea. Harum cupiditate voluptas et est. Libero repudiandae eum odio praesentium commodi commodi.

Deleniti repudiandae quasi quia et dolorem beatae velit necessitatibus. Impedit dolor odit repellat quae. Voluptatem quaerat quis voluptas dolor libero incidunt quam. Quo dolor quas neque quidem ut vero.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”