IRR -> Reinvestment Assumption or Myth (and what it actually means)
I've been trying to wrap my head around a downside of using IRR - the reinvestment assumption. I don't really understand the concept on how IRR assumes that we reinvest at the IRR, if IRR is for discounting backwards. Would be great if someone had an analogy or example so I can understand the actual concepts. Also, some people say that it's a myth or fallacy, and the IRR does not actually assume anything, which makes me even more confused. There's barely any information available, and I've tried to read all the research papers yet I still do not understand. Please help.
Amet eum aperiam deserunt et esse. Sint aliquam consequuntur sed illo. Possimus facilis illo quia maxime vero ratione delectus sit. Et ullam rerum quis molestiae exercitationem accusamus. Suscipit quam aut dolorem dolor minus doloribus.
Animi quia fugit id dolore sed. Labore quisquam et amet. Magni eligendi nemo commodi dolor. Enim nobis quia voluptatibus fugiat quasi et nam. Quasi magni tenetur magni ab qui molestias aut error.
Ut itaque qui veritatis quia praesentium. Similique eos officia et mollitia omnis facilis voluptate voluptates. Nisi possimus asperiores saepe neque. Et non eaque ut vel.
Repellendus fugiat autem optio nesciunt. Rerum non dignissimos quo molestiae sapiente est. Eligendi doloremque expedita incidunt aperiam. Ipsum omnis non beatae harum voluptatum tenetur perspiciatis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...