JPM 2026 Group Rankings / Placement

Very rough prestige/exit hierarchy. Massive variance within groups — top analyst in a “lower tier” group will out-exit an average analyst in M&A. Take with a grain of salt.

Tier 1:

M&A
HC
M&C

Tier 2:

DI (Industrials)
Tech
FSG
Consumer (C&R)

Tier 3 (Nicher exits, but still great groups):

FIG
Real Estate

Tier 4

P&R
Mid-Cap
Business Services

Tier 5

Mid-Cap M&A
Emerging Tech

Tier 6

IFA
M&A SEAMAC
M&A SIG
CFA
Ratings

Thoughts?

41 Comments
 

FIG is not tier 4, at least tier 1.5. Top analyst at mid group can’t out-exit analyst at HC/M&A/M&C. These are the 4 groups that will get a look from MFs and exits guarantee at least UMM.

 

UMM guarantee is not possible. There are multiples more IB analysts at supposed top groups vs. total seats at UMM/MF PE. Top analyst at worse coverage group at JPM exits to UMM/MF and median at top groups exit to a MM. All the hardos go to M&A, so they place better. You'll get similar PE looks from all the relevant coverage groups at all top BB/EBs. Median exit is almost always MM PE if a large group simply due to seat count in PE vs IB.

 

Non-Tier 1 exits are still strong — just more variance and a less concentrated MF funnel.

Tier 2 can definitely place MF/UMM if you’re top bucket, have real reps, and interview well. Tier 3 places very well within its niche — you’ll see strong buyside outcomes, especially at sector-focused funds.

Tier 4–5 skew more UMM/MM and sector funds. Mid-Cap especially has placed well as of late given it’s a growing group.

At the end of the day analyst quality, deal exposure, and interview ability matter more than the tier.

 

It’s so obvious this post is from an intern who just finished placement lol. Congrats on a shit group.

 

FSG’s class is tiny — I think ~5–7 interns most years — so you naturally get a ton of reps. It’s a product group with heavy modeling and you’re directly interfacing with PE funds all the time, which is obviously relevant for exits. Smaller group also means seniors actually know you well and the culture is pretty tight, so historically they’ve been willing to go to bat for analysts. I’ve heard Jamie’s newer on-cycle rules have toned down how much seniors can directly influence recruiting, but the exposure + relationships are still a big plus. Definitely a strong option if you want sponsor / PE adjacency.

 

They’re a newer group after splitting from Consumer (formerly CRB), and from what I’ve heard the transition hasn’t been perfectly smooth culture/workflow-wise — others can chime in. That said, it’s still Business Services, so you get solid modeling reps and generalist exposure. Good option if you’re not 100% set on a niche yet and exits should still be fine

 

Chimp444

They’re a newer group after splitting from Consumer (formerly CRB), and from what I’ve heard the transition hasn’t been perfectly smooth culture/workflow-wise — others can chime in. That said, it’s still Business Services, so you get solid modeling reps and generalist exposure. Good option if you’re not 100% set on a niche yet and exits should still be fine

Is it mostly middle market deals or do they do big deals too?

 
Most Helpful

Good list.

FSG should be down a few tiers. They have no exposure to M&A and are mainly working on mundane tasks and chaperoning other deals from a sponsor coverage perspective. Exits are not as good as they used to be due to the new Dimon rule.

FIG should probably replace C&R in tier 2. C&R is a pretty stagnant group and has limited dealflow.

Business Services is a wildcard. Who knows how that team will pan out. Similar team to DI from a large coverage area, deal volume standpoint so might be good if they grow it successfully but a bit tbd for now.

 

Why is SIG M&A so low? They sit within M&A, can get staffed as generalist M&A analysts, and are the M&A analysts on sponsor deals that come through.

 

Worked adjacent to this group over a summer. They are the FSG team for middle market sponsors—anything outside the major 10-15 sponsors

JPM’s equivalent to FSG at WF, HL, etc.

Bit of a unique group in that they work across Global Banking’s (Commercial, Corporate, Investment) clients like the other commenter said, but heavily focus on introducing the Commercial Bank’s clients (20mm-2bn revenue) to sponsors, and arranging the debt for those LBOs/investments/whatever. Classic FSG coverage for mid cap sponsors, good place to be, but exits naturally limited mostly to the MM. Still pretty sweaty but not as bad as Large Cap IB (70-80 hours is normal)

 

Unless you disagree / have anything to add, this is not really equivalent to FSG at WF or HL. An FSG seat at WF or HL would be an investment banking role. JPM MMFSG is a commercial banking role, it does not have commensurate compensation or WLB to an IB analyst seat. The role from a junior perspective is more akin to a credit analyst.

Still a good seat within a great bank, but if you are looking for a traditional investment banking analyst seat, would avoid.

 

Omnis enim dignissimos voluptatibus quod quos. Neque fuga qui nostrum ut. Ducimus rerum natus quos qui ducimus.

 

Perspiciatis quia perferendis facere mollitia eveniet. Consequatur consequatur ut ut at nobis sed fuga voluptatem. Dolores distinctio sunt magni porro delectus magni. Perspiciatis et nobis et et cupiditate molestias aut mollitia. Dolor inventore in ut nulla beatae qui fugit. Error cum quis harum molestiae. Necessitatibus fuga nobis sit dolores placeat aut saepe ullam. Voluptatum nostrum quidem a maxime eos odit.

Similique qui modi debitis mollitia placeat fugit incidunt. Dolores aliquam tempora reprehenderit amet dolorum quasi. Tenetur impedit voluptatum consequatur reprehenderit autem excepturi illum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”