LSE Mfin vs LBS MFA
Chimps
LSE mfin vs LBS MFA
Which program would give me the best outlook for landing a FT investment banking position in London?
Would appreciate any input on this. Thx
Chimps
LSE mfin vs LBS MFA
Which program would give me the best outlook for landing a FT investment banking position in London?
Would appreciate any input on this. Thx
+245 | My chaotic IB journey | 27 | 12h | |
+211 | MS M&A vs GS HC | 49 | 1s | |
+177 | Ending My Life if I don't get an SA 2025 Offer | 63 | 1d | |
+115 | Anyone live in a different country before? What’s it like? | 43 | 21h | |
+74 | Hazing in the Bullpen. What to do? | 15 | 13h | |
+55 | Improving in TMT | 24 | 14m | |
+53 | MD shoved food down my throat. Is this normal? | 16 | 1d | |
+39 | Later Chodes - I'm Taking My Talents to The Mega Fund Leagues | 10 | 3h | |
+36 | Basically necessary to be a varsity athlete to get BB IB from Bowdoin? | 22 | 1d | |
+19 | Too late to be Analyst 1 with 5 years of experience? | 16 | 3d |
Career Resources
Delete
in this case, the LSE MFin (MSc Finance) is pre experience - source: myself, i’m an alum
How much of your class ended up in top finance roles?
The MFin is basically a finance focused MBA. It is not a standard masters.
One recruits at analyst level and the other at associate.
Yes I know, thanks. But its LSE mfin vs LBS MFA
My bad, I can't read
LSE MFin alumni here. If I could turn back time I’d have gone to LBS.
Could you send me a DM? You're anom
LBS has the better alum/careers service. LSE might be more rigorous but no one really cares when it comes to getting the job, they are seen equal.
LSE is quite academic whilst LBS focuses a lot on recruiting, so would go with LBS.
Unless you have a previous IB internship in LDN it's going to be very difficult to get a FT roles straight from the Masters. FT positions are typically filled with people who did a SA in LDN in a different bank. I've seen cases where ppl have gotten a FT gig with no previous LDN internship but these are the exception rather than the norm. (Your chances are higher if you network heavily or are a diversity candidate). I'm currently pursuing the LSE Mfin and most of my classmates are applying for SA/OCs rather than FT positions.
Regarding both schools, if your sole purpose is getting a job, LBS is definitely better. My decision to go for LSE was more of a personal one rather than an objective one. Anyway, having gone through the recruiting season this year, here are my takeaways of why I believe LBS is better:
1) Less internal competition: Banks have internal quotas by school (not in a strict way but they wouldn't hire 90% of interns from 1 school only). Let's say a bank wants 20 interns from LSE and 20 from LBS. At LBS you don't have an undergraduate department, you are only competing against your MFA classmates and perhaps some guys from the MiM programme. At LSE, you are competing against your MFin classmates, the guys from the MFPE, MF&E and MSc A&F programmes as well as the 2nd year and 3rd year undergrads from Econ/finance/etc. I've seen LSE kids from randoms degrees such as bsc in government break into banking, so yeah the internal competition is harder
2) LBS career service is better: they are ahead of the game and know the importance of applying early. (They start around mid-August). On the contrary, LSE careers was still hosting CV workshops in the last week of September this year. Most banks applications are out by the last week of August /first week of September. It is crucial to apply within the first two weeks after the application has opened, otherwise it is highly unlikely that you will get a first round. Some of my LSE classmates started applying for jobs around the 1st week of October which is too late IMO
3) Optional additional term: LBS has an optional additional term which lets you pass as a penultimate year student. (It extends your programme from 12 to 18 months).This allows to bypass the screening when applying for SA positions + you can also apply for FT/OC. LSE has something similar called "Work Placement pathway" but it only adds an additional summer term and extends the programme from 9 to 12 months. Most of my LSE classmates (including me) lied on the application form stating that we would graduate in 2024. Although I haven't heard of cases where the offer has been rescinded because of this issue, I didn't feel at all comfortable when lying on the application form
4) Fewer visa issues (if you are an international): given that the LSE Mfin lasts less than 12 months you only get 2 additional months as vacation/right to work period. (I.e. you graduate in mid June but your right to work is extended until mid August). This means that my right to work will expire before my SA internship is over (late August) and I will have to apply for the Graduate Visa to extend my stay and complete my internship. According to the Careers service this shouldn't cause any problem but yeah I'll still have to explain to the bank I will be interning at. On the contrary, the LBS programme lasts 12 months and includes the summer as a module-free term so you take the internship. This means that your graduation date is in August and because it's a 12 month programme you get 4 extra months of vacation/right to work period. You wouldn't need to apply for the graduate visa even if you take a 6 month Off Cycle that starts in June
Top dog. Many thanks!
I’m a LBS alumni and can highly recommend the school (did not do the MFA). Career services are usually dedicate a lot of resources to these programs.
Echoing comments above - LBS is much stronger than LSE as a feeder school into IB, especially in London.
Got an offer from LBS MFA yesterday and LSE MFin today (rejected at HEC though). Super happy about getting here obviously, but also not knowing what to do.
Really appreciate the feedback everyone is giving and I think I am leaning on taking the LBS offer considering my goal is to enter IB (will have two years of work exp in VC by the time I join the program in part and full time investment roles), but damn it's hard to just turn down LSE, especially when coming from a BBA at a no-name school in the third world and also knowing the admissions rate is lower at LSE and the academics at the MFA are not really serious (from past students).
Guess just wanted to vent and see if anyone also thought about this.
Take LBS, it’s a no brainer.
Congrats first of all! Would you mind sharing your profile and when you applied for the programs?
LBS 100%
How is the LBS MFA viewed vs other finance masters?
Molestiae rerum enim eum. Velit dolor occaecati eum repellendus corrupti velit amet.
Non perferendis maiores nihil at aut quod repudiandae numquam. Dolor rerum et possimus amet. Et aliquam ut labore reiciendis. Ipsam ea nihil officia dolorum ipsum laborum numquam aliquam. Voluptate voluptatem numquam dolorem delectus est voluptas sequi atque. Minima dicta et sed. Fuga necessitatibus nihil deleniti debitis odit nostrum.
Ut dolore ex consequuntur id occaecati repellat. Eaque quae est veritatis non sit sapiente. Qui velit eos amet error qui magnam. Consequatur ut perspiciatis aliquam. Aut sunt voluptatem voluptas nisi id culpa temporibus nostrum. Porro est sit enim.
Voluptas deleniti delectus et omnis. Alias quidem atque commodi eaque repellat sunt. Mollitia dolorem magnam ratione omnis qui accusantium. Architecto laborum libero qui ut alias.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...