LevFin vs. RX

I'm thinking about recruiting for RX but also considering LevFin. Is the recruiting prep/process very different? Seems like both have to do with debt lol, but not sure if I have more time to study Lev Fin technicals. Can anyone provide some insight into the 2 groups (in terms of interview Q's, culture, and hours)?

4 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown of LevFin vs. RX in terms of recruiting prep, interview questions, culture, and hours:

  1. Recruiting Prep/Process:

    • RX: Restructuring (RX) interviews often focus on understanding distressed situations, capital structures, and bankruptcy processes. You'll need to be familiar with concepts like liquidation waterfalls, distressed debt investing, and restructuring strategies. RX also involves operational and legal aspects, so expect questions that test your ability to think critically about a company's financial and operational health.
    • LevFin: Leveraged Finance (LevFin) interviews are more focused on debt structuring, credit analysis, and LBO modeling. You'll need to understand how to structure loans, analyze credit metrics, and assess the risk/return profile of leveraged transactions.
  2. Interview Questions:

    • RX interviews may include technical questions about distressed debt, bankruptcy filings, and restructuring scenarios. For example, you might be asked to walk through a Chapter 11 process or explain how you'd approach a distressed company's capital structure.
    • LevFin interviews will likely test your knowledge of credit metrics (e.g., leverage ratios, interest coverage), debt covenants, and LBO modeling. You might be asked to structure a debt package for a hypothetical acquisition.
  3. Culture:

    • RX teams, especially at top shops like PJT, HL, and Lazard, are known for sharp, collaborative cultures with a focus on problem-solving in high-stakes situations. Hours can be intense, but the work is often intellectually stimulating due to the complexity of distressed situations.
    • LevFin teams tend to have a more transactional focus, working on deal execution for leveraged buyouts and other debt-heavy transactions. The culture can vary by firm, but it's generally fast-paced and deal-oriented.
  4. Hours:

    • RX hours can be brutal, especially during active restructuring cases, as you're often working with tight deadlines and high-pressure situations. However, some RX teams (e.g., PJT, HL) are noted for better work-life balance compared to others.
    • LevFin hours are also demanding, but they may be slightly more predictable compared to RX, as the work is more deal-driven and less reactive to crises.

In summary, while both groups deal with debt, RX leans more towards distressed and operational problem-solving, while LevFin focuses on structuring and executing leveraged transactions. Your choice should depend on your interest in distressed situations versus deal execution and your willingness to handle the respective technical prep.

Sources: Recruiting for RX FT after M&A virtual internship?, leveraged finance interview - what to prep, Genuine Question: why are Pjt and HL RX teams considered better than MoCo RX?, How is A&M perceived in the industry?, HL RX vs Moelis

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

RX definitely tougher to get into. See Moyer’s distressed debt analysis. Gatto’s credit investor handbook has some distressed debt material, but begins more broadly with material relevant to both

 
Most Helpful

Saepe ut fuga voluptatem esse. Ut doloremque assumenda ut aut.

Labore occaecati reiciendis quasi et dolorem. In culpa quaerat dolor magni voluptate. Pariatur error et accusantium quia. Est neque illo maxime commodi commodi. Repellendus mollitia alias commodi beatae.

Quisquam beatae unde quod quia et non harum laudantium. Quia aut unde voluptatem non. Amet quia officia expedita modi doloremque quos. Assumenda aliquid doloribus aperiam esse.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”