LevFin vs. RX
I'm thinking about recruiting for RX but also considering LevFin. Is the recruiting prep/process very different? Seems like both have to do with debt lol, but not sure if I have more time to study Lev Fin technicals. Can anyone provide some insight into the 2 groups (in terms of interview Q's, culture, and hours)?
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown of LevFin vs. RX in terms of recruiting prep, interview questions, culture, and hours:
Recruiting Prep/Process:
Interview Questions:
Culture:
Hours:
In summary, while both groups deal with debt, RX leans more towards distressed and operational problem-solving, while LevFin focuses on structuring and executing leveraged transactions. Your choice should depend on your interest in distressed situations versus deal execution and your willingness to handle the respective technical prep.
Sources: Recruiting for RX FT after M&A virtual internship?, leveraged finance interview - what to prep, Genuine Question: why are Pjt and HL RX teams considered better than MoCo RX?, How is A&M perceived in the industry?, HL RX vs Moelis
If you know Rx you’ll know Levfin. Rx is just a more technical version of levfin.
RX definitely tougher to get into. See Moyer’s distressed debt analysis. Gatto’s credit investor handbook has some distressed debt material, but begins more broadly with material relevant to both
Sed alias et quae. Aut pariatur sit qui eligendi voluptate unde. Deserunt est repudiandae quibusdam et commodi fugiat blanditiis officia.
Sit consequatur cumque sed quos minus quidem. Vel vitae quibusdam amet doloremque ut accusamus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...