41 Comments
 

Think that DC has a solid infra team in LDN. From deal flow seems to lean toward RX though but could just be the recent market.

 

Think this is a bit of a generalisation - agreed on GS (not really for infra but more Natres) and MS (good in transport) macquarie (mainly power / utilities) and Barclays (mainly power / utilities).

UBS and greencoat are indeed in the same league as DC, Roths, cantor, evercore etc

 

Copying from another thread asking the exact same question just a few months ago:There is some level of overlap between the two but best Infra players in London would be MS, BofA, Macquarie, (Citi?), Roths, Evercore and UBS. For NatRes GSBarclays, Macquarie, Lazard, MS (O&G).

Personally, would replace BofA with RBC

 

To add to my point the reason BBs have essentially given up on infrastructure IBD and ceded it to the boutiques is precisely because it’s a terrible business. It’s hard work, technically and low margin and attracts lower calibre talent to the rest of finance on the sellside and buyside. Literally the special olympics of banking and private equity 

 

Suggesting JPM DI attracts low calibre talent is ridiculous

JPM’s infra business is an afterthought. They have one M&A and one financing banker who focuses on it.  Both good bankers,  and def not low calibre, but the business has no scale or relevance and I’m guessing both those guys are in the bottom quartile of MD comp. 
 

JPM is all about the country teams and one or two industry groups. That’s where you get paid.

 

Can you please elaborate on this? Infra and P&U are one of the most technical industries and some transactions, on the structured debt & equity tend to fairly complex. Special Olympics is quite an overstatement and sounds very petty

Yep, and that’s precisely why it sucks balls

Any monkey can with enough training become technically proficient at modeling 

There’s no alpha in power / utes  / infra relative to other sectors.

ILiterally in Europe power / utes/  infra attracts the most technically proficient least commercially capable people around. 

 

To add to my point the reason BBs have essentially given up on infrastructure IBD and ceded it to the boutiques is precisely because it’s a terrible business. It’s hard work, technically and low margin and attracts lower calibre talent to the rest of finance on the sellside and buyside. Literally the special olympics of banking and private equity 

A lot of truth to this sadly, and anyone who's done infra advisory knows firsthand. Look no further than what happened to MS's project finance team. However, there's definitely some smart and capable people within the space, so I don't fully agree that it attracts low caliber talent. 

 

I truly agree with you... Infra transaction is unnecessarily detailed (unless it's operating asset with everything fixed)

However infra is also a downside resilience business + lighter hours

I would tend to think it attracts risk-averse smart people (in your terms, not necessarily commercial enough) and a lot of harddo (amazing in technical but not able to translate their thinking into paper)

 

Of course there are smart and capable people - more billionaires recently from infrastructure fund creation than private equity and plenty of folks who’ve made high eight and nine figures. It’s still a brilliant asset class, but the best returns are probably passed. 

My point is that in Europe, the sector is so mature and saturated that is all about eking the nth basis point out of a low return asset so it’s very technical but zero alpha. That doesn’t sound like an exciting space for someone to start their career. Go where the growth and differentiation is, 

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Generally speaking, infrastructure is a game for project finance banks. The Japanese and French are typically very strong, but when it comes to bigger transactions, you will also see a JPM or Morgan Stanley involved. Lazard and DC are quite strong, just to name a few non-balance sheet institutions. Depends heavily on region - take a look at IJGlobal League Tables (doesn't matter if it's two/three years old, things are not too dynamic in the sector) and you'll quickly get a feel for the “who's who” in the sector.

 

Harum esse omnis omnis id molestiae illum ut. Recusandae reiciendis mollitia est inventore totam explicabo in. Aperiam incidunt quia et quisquam natus non laboriosam rem. Nemo et qui natus ea. Unde nulla dolores sint earum omnis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”