18 Comments
 

I think it would be easier for people to help if you made your model easier to read. Right now, everything in there is black. Impossible to figure out without going through each individual cell.

It helps a lot for your own doublechecking to do this, as well. Try this: blue for inputs, black for formulas, green for any cell or sheet references. You can add a fourth color like purple in the future for cells with relevant formulas (if you use a calculations sheet).

in it 2 win it
 
Kassad

I think it would be easier for people to help if you made your model easier to read. Right now, everything in there is black. Impossible to figure out without going through each individual cell.

It helps a lot for your own doublechecking to do this, as well. Try this: blue for inputs, black for formulas, green for any cell or sheet references. You can add a fourth color like purple in the future for cells with relevant formulas (if you use a calculations sheet).

Funny you say that, I did that the minute I opened it.

Blue horseshoe loves Anacott Steel
 
Best Response

a few things look screwed up at first glance. I would encourage you to think through each line on the cash flow statement and think about what changes on the balance sheet as a result. first, it looks like you have $250 of debt maturing in 2014 that i don't see being reflected on the CFS (maybe I missed it). Also you are showing proceeds from asset sales under investing activities, but I'm failing to see how this ties into PP&E. Associated with the assets sold should be selling off a certain amount of net book value that will need to be reflected in PP&E. I don't see that happening. I certainly don't think this is a quick-fix issue, looks like some of the key fundamentals in this model are just off.

 

Yikes man. See a lot of things that don't look right either. As your model's running now your cash available to paydown debt amort. is negative, that means you need to be drawing down on your revolver / credit facility to cover.

Also, idk what you're going for (know you're not asking about this) but that's not how you model an E&P company. Sent you a PM.

Ace all your PE interview questions with the WSO Private Equity Prep Pack: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/guide/private-equity-interview-prep-questions
 
Stringer Bell

Yikes man. See a lot of things that don't look right either. As your model's running now your cash available to paydown debt amort. is negative, that means you need to be drawing down on your revolver / credit facility to cover.

Also, idk what you're going for (know you're not asking about this) but that's not how you model an E&P company. Sent you a PM.

Read and study his PM. How am I looking at a model for Hess projected out several years without any explicit mention of production growth on a boe basis and commodity prices? Sorry if I missed it but I looked at every tab. Where are you coming up with your projected net income figures? Maybe you have some of this going on behind the scenes but an E&P Model is nearly worthless if you don't have those as variable inputs that can drive the model. Also, in my opinion no model is complete without an NAV in this industry. Take a look at the reserves in the 10-K, slap a multiple that makes sense on their midstream/downstream etc.

 

Your model is not balancing because your CF statement is completely screwed.

You are adding back a whole host of adjustments that have no corresponding BS movement. You can't just randomly throw cash around on your CF statement, make no changes to your BS and expect it to balance. Go through CF and think about what is and isn't moving on the BS.

e.g: - CF, row 11: You need to impair assets as this is non cash - CF, row 12-14: You are adding back items to Net Income, ok, so what are you moving on the BS to compensate for these? Equity is still going up by net income, so you need to either increase assets or decrease liabilities. - CF, row 31: These dividends aren't flowing to change in equity - etc

Also, your DS is screwed. Check out your average calculations...

To debug, try this:

  • link to your BS check on your CF so you can see as you move things how that changes
  • delete rows 11,12,13,14,16,18, 24, 31, 32, 33 (from column M to W)
  • your model now balances
  • systematically work through each row, adding back the adjustment, one by one, and think about the corresponding BS change you need to make
  • don't move to the next until you make the BS balance
 

FYI, your NCI payments and stock option exercises arent linked to the equity portion of your BS. This doesnt account for your entire 433, but it accounts for part of it (im sure theres a few more cashflow items that arent linked up).

Array
 
mop33

Also, your DS is screwed. Check out your average calculations...

You should have =AVERAGE(beginning balance, ending balance) (i.e. comma, not addition)

Why are there empty columns between the years? Did you manually do every formula (i.e. =[prior year]+1 for each year cell) or did you set it up properly (i.e. =[prior year]+1 and drag it over) and then insert the columns? Regardless, there is no need for the extra space.

Also, why is the risk-free rate 5.5%?

 

Aside from all the CF/BS changes mentioned above, you also need to fix the sign in your calculation in Row 38 on the Balance Sheet (where you account for the dividends). As you have it now, dividends are being added to retained earnings instead of subtracted. This, along with the changes mentioned above, should balance the model.

 
ibanker26

Aside from all the CF/BS changes mentioned above, you also need to fix the sign in your calculation in Row 38 on the Balance Sheet (where you account for the dividends). As you have it now, dividends are being added to retained earnings instead of subtracted. This, along with the changes mentioned above, should balance the model.

I would Have just posted that !

 

Enim aut quia rem suscipit eos. Commodi fuga voluptas sit adipisci repellendus. Et doloribus illum quia sunt.

Sapiente nisi qui occaecati modi vel veritatis. Repellendus impedit unde deleniti molestias natus dolores. Impedit quia officia temporibus nulla consequatur harum adipisci.

Id dolorum sed nobis. Autem ipsum corrupti et voluptatem explicabo quod repudiandae. Aspernatur voluptatem eum cupiditate doloremque. Quia alias hic unde esse. Voluptates porro dolorum vel ratione vitae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”