i presume your question means transacted comps (post-money) vs tradingcomps (pre-money).
It is not "preferred" per se, it is just another data point for the valuer - knowing what other people have paid for similar companies is very useful in your valuation.
In any real work though, you would use trading comps, transacted comps and DCF to value a company. Thereafter, you would have a range of prices that you know is reasonable to purchase the company for.
If you REALLY want to justify that it is better, then take this analogy - When buying a second-hand Honda Accord on the market, you know the list price of it (trading comp). However, this may be drastically different from the amount someone actually paid for it (transacted comp) - other buyers may have negotiated the prices down etc., so the actual price is lower*. As a buyer, it is more helpful to you to know the transacted price.
*In a scenario with companies, the transacted comp is usually higher than the trading comp because of the control premium one would have to pay.
Exercitationem est aspernatur expedita est minus tempora recusandae. Iusto quia deserunt voluptates nisi cum. Rerum labore temporibus eligendi quis. Minus ut sequi fugit et iure eligendi vel. Ut ducimus tempora ut et dicta assumenda unde magnam. Nihil vel ut dolores totam ipsa commodi veritatis.
Quam et quis ut mollitia veritatis rerum commodi aliquam. Ullam quae quaerat debitis optio sed placeat quia. Quisquam quasi assumenda itaque velit aut dolor. Dolorem pariatur veniam in corrupti et sequi error. In ut asperiores quibusdam et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
i presume your question means transacted comps (post-money) vs trading comps (pre-money).
It is not "preferred" per se, it is just another data point for the valuer - knowing what other people have paid for similar companies is very useful in your valuation.
In any real work though, you would use trading comps, transacted comps and DCF to value a company. Thereafter, you would have a range of prices that you know is reasonable to purchase the company for.
If you REALLY want to justify that it is better, then take this analogy - When buying a second-hand Honda Accord on the market, you know the list price of it (trading comp). However, this may be drastically different from the amount someone actually paid for it (transacted comp) - other buyers may have negotiated the prices down etc., so the actual price is lower*. As a buyer, it is more helpful to you to know the transacted price.
*In a scenario with companies, the transacted comp is usually higher than the trading comp because of the control premium one would have to pay.
Exercitationem est aspernatur expedita est minus tempora recusandae. Iusto quia deserunt voluptates nisi cum. Rerum labore temporibus eligendi quis. Minus ut sequi fugit et iure eligendi vel. Ut ducimus tempora ut et dicta assumenda unde magnam. Nihil vel ut dolores totam ipsa commodi veritatis.
Quam et quis ut mollitia veritatis rerum commodi aliquam. Ullam quae quaerat debitis optio sed placeat quia. Quisquam quasi assumenda itaque velit aut dolor. Dolorem pariatur veniam in corrupti et sequi error. In ut asperiores quibusdam et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...