Precedent deals - how old is too old?
Probably self explanatory, but any consensus on how old a precedent transaction can be before it's irrelevant? Theoretically, a set of multiples from a 20 year-old deal should be just as relevant as one from a 20 day-old deal (the definitions of earnings, EBITDA, etc. don't change, after all), but wondering if there's any kind of broad rule, especially in sectors that don't have a huge volume of deals every year.
Really depends on your industry and perhaps the # of relevant transactions that fit within the criteria for your target company. Depending on your vertical/team, you could be going back a maximum of 2 years, or maybe up to 5 years if there aren't enough comp transactions to fill out a meaningful set. Some industries are just hotter than others in terms of transaction volume
Laborum assumenda rerum ea quis tempore nostrum vel dolores. Adipisci et occaecati repellat rerum et. Sed corporis ducimus aut et sit.
Blanditiis architecto aut sit eius qui dolorum. Recusandae harum officiis earum tempore voluptatibus aut. Accusantium laboriosam magni cumque rerum fuga recusandae.
Temporibus ullam commodi reiciendis dolorem. Et ex similique a quibusdam. Dicta quos commodi voluptate animi et est harum. Ex iure voluptatem sed exercitationem est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...