Curious to hear the diffference between the two. Qatalyst dominates tech m&a, can the same be said for evercore menlo? Given the insane dealflow at Qatalyst and the smaller team size, on a per capita basis is it just that much better than Evercore?
| +213 | Return Rates For Interns Are Falling? | 87 | 54m |
| +128 | UBS Americas IB: The Kids’ Table of Wall Street | 17 | 37m |
| +105 | I am a drunk MD AMA | 39 | 1h |
| +81 | KISSED MY VP… HELP!!! | 14 | 17h |
| +63 | VP Lifestyle at Top BB Coverage Groups | 40 | 20h |
| +57 | An Outsider’s View of RX Banking Out of College | 6 | 3d |
| +49 | SharePoint makes IB hours HELL | 15 | 3d |
| +49 | UBS Offer Day | 18 | 19h |
| +44 | momentum of Rx groups | 16 | 23h |
| +35 | WF Return offers | 22 | 18m |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Based on the most helpful WSO content:
Qatalyst vs. Evercore Menlo Park (MP)
Qatalyst: - Dominance in Tech M&A: Qatalyst is known for its strong presence and dominance in tech M&A. - Deal Flow: Qatalyst has a high volume of deal flow, which is a significant advantage. - Team Size: The smaller team size at Qatalyst means that on a per capita basis, the exposure and experience might be more intense and valuable.
Evercore Menlo Park: - Deal Flow: Evercore Menlo Park also has solid deal flow, with varied transactions including sell-side, buy-side, and capital markets work. They have handled significant transactions like the sale of BlueJeans to Verizon for $500 million. - Tech M&A: While Evercore is a strong name in finance and offers great looks for traditional PE exits, it is not considered as dominant in tech M&A as Qatalyst. - Work Experience: Evercore provides a more typical banking experience compared to Qatalyst, which might have a more consulting-like approach for some of its retainer clients.
Key Differences:
Conclusion:
If your primary goal is to gain intense tech M&A experience, Qatalyst might be the better choice due to its dominance and high deal flow. However, if you are looking for a broader range of experiences and strong traditional PE exit opportunities, Evercore Menlo Park is also an excellent option.
Sources: Evercore Menlo vs Lazard SF vs Greenhill SF vs PWP SF, Evercore v.s. Lazard v.s. PJT Partners, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/whats-so-good-about-evercore?customgpt=1, Rank EB’s in SF for Tech, Tech Investment banking NYC vs SF
I mean Qatalyst has no equal, GS TMT is close but yeah on a per capita basis Qatalyst destroys them. U see GS TMT -> Qatalyst all the time, but how often do you see Qatalyst -> GS TMT or any other tech group on the street? Answer is almost never, qatalyst is just that good.
Evercore menlo is great, have heard they are sweaty, but what good tech group isn’t. Nobody matches up to Q though not even trying to dickride
Temporibus voluptas temporibus et aperiam. Corporis voluptas qui tempora ex facilis aut molestiae. Dolorem reprehenderit enim quibusdam voluptatem.
Doloribus explicabo laudantium in hic nostrum. Voluptatem architecto ducimus laboriosam unde qui omnis. Sed id commodi reprehenderit molestias officiis.
Totam impedit at quos possimus. Laboriosam atque magnam eos libero velit at. Voluptas voluptate voluptate aut dignissimos tenetur aut ipsum.
Labore rerum unde qui vitae. Distinctio quis eaque autem ea accusantium quam cupiditate reiciendis. Et fugiat unde consequatur asperiores aut. Debitis accusantium similique voluptatibus. Nesciunt recusandae assumenda voluptates molestiae sed excepturi vel. Nulla non aut nihil dolorum dolorum reprehenderit eveniet.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...