This might be a bit of a stupid question, but from what I've seen (especially in North America), American BBs tend to be stronger than European BBs in M&A, with European BBs seeming to rely more on Sponsors/Levfin. I would think the name-brand recognition of American BBs helps in North America, but I'm curious to know what other factors may be at play here.
| +190 | Evercore > Goldman and I don’t think it’s particularly close anymore | 65 | 15h |
| +157 | Article: Why UBS's Asian M&A bankers are thriving and UBS's American M&A bankers are not | 17 | 1d |
| +87 | UBS Offer Day | 31 | 1h |
| +85 | Think Twice before Recruiting for HOUSTON IB!! | 44 | 2h |
| +71 | I hate Wells Fargo | 19 | 1d |
| +52 | No return offer - feeling like a failure is an understatement | 21 | 5h |
| +49 | How cooked am I as an incoming WF IB SA 2027? | 17 | 1d |
| +47 | WF Return offers | 28 | 3d |
| +40 | 2026 Investment Banking Return Offer Climate | 25 | 1d |
| +39 | Should I go back into a junior IBD role for comp? | 16 | 3d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Dolores sint perferendis quas possimus. Ad odio accusantium aperiam reiciendis et repudiandae. Quia nesciunt atque aut occaecati. In accusamus et ut deserunt autem et. Ut corporis sunt cum itaque nesciunt est. Totam dolor sint perferendis corporis sed. Similique expedita quam odit dolores magni ut accusamus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...