This might be a bit of a stupid question, but from what I've seen (especially in North America), American BBs tend to be stronger than European BBs in M&A, with European BBs seeming to rely more on Sponsors/Levfin. I would think the name-brand recognition of American BBs helps in North America, but I'm curious to know what other factors may be at play here.
| +148 | UBS Catastrophic Q1-Q3 26, M&A -17%, Outside Top 10 in Americas, EMEA & APAC | 44 | 10h |
| +64 | PWP acquisition by Piper cancelled | 27 | 13h |
| +43 | No return offer - UPDATE. | 12 | 9h |
| +37 | Article: UBS Wall Street Rebuild Is a Study in Management Failure | 6 | 9h |
| +36 | Evercore poaches Baird DC Defense Team | 28 | 7h |
| +30 | Is my MD a grifter? 16 years, 8 firms | 10 | 7h |
| +24 | Lack of talent in IB! | 19 | 2d |
| +23 | Best Houston Banks for Culture in 2026 | 18 | 13h |
| +21 | Internal lateral from coverage to M&A (focused on coverage) | 6 | 20h |
| +21 | Moat of modelling in PE/Finance completely vanished; | 3 | 10h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Ipsum modi voluptas natus temporibus et et nihil. Dolorem optio alias fuga qui corporis aliquid repudiandae. Molestiae eius est ut aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...