I understand that in a DCF, you don't include taxes in the FCFF, because it is already included in the tax shield in the WACC. But why is it not possible to leave it out of the WACC but then include it in the FCFF? Just in theory, why doesn't that make sense?
You certainly can leave it out of the WACC, but then in that case you'll be discounting FCFF at the unlevered cost of capital and then adding the present value of tax shields to arrive at the enterprise value; this enterprise value will be identical to the enterprise value derived from the WACC method. See "APV Valuation Method" for more context.
But is it also possible to leave it out at the WACC and then not calculate NOPAT in the CF but rather only subtract the actual taxes, as tax shield is now not part of WACC anymore?
Quo repellat nobis vero odio deserunt. Ratione enim blanditiis architecto dolor dolores occaecati. Soluta sequi vel sed sit ut voluptatem non. Odit quia corrupti rem dolorum aspernatur enim sit nobis. Voluptas commodi numquam doloremque dolorum sit iure vel in. Illum facere eveniet expedita iste provident.
Dicta iusto consequatur alias voluptatem. Explicabo ullam enim facere magnam quos magnam distinctio.
Voluptate aliquam et qui qui et sed possimus. Explicabo aut cumque adipisci quod. Quisquam rerum numquam eligendi adipisci. Consequatur cum unde velit tempora et. Est quia sed totam consequatur. Occaecati totam quis velit voluptatem consequuntur qui.
Dolores id et et esse aut voluptas autem. Vitae modi dolores dolores veritatis nemo. Autem quaerat veritatis autem sit. Nobis velit est ducimus ea sed voluptate. Aut laborum sint dolore rerum odit distinctio officiis cupiditate.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
You certainly can leave it out of the WACC, but then in that case you'll be discounting FCFF at the unlevered cost of capital and then adding the present value of tax shields to arrive at the enterprise value; this enterprise value will be identical to the enterprise value derived from the WACC method. See "APV Valuation Method" for more context.
But is it also possible to leave it out at the WACC and then not calculate NOPAT in the CF but rather only subtract the actual taxes, as tax shield is now not part of WACC anymore?
You could build out something from net income, so levered free cash flow, which would get you to equity value. And then u could go from equity value to enterprise value.
Quo repellat nobis vero odio deserunt. Ratione enim blanditiis architecto dolor dolores occaecati. Soluta sequi vel sed sit ut voluptatem non. Odit quia corrupti rem dolorum aspernatur enim sit nobis. Voluptas commodi numquam doloremque dolorum sit iure vel in. Illum facere eveniet expedita iste provident.
Dicta iusto consequatur alias voluptatem. Explicabo ullam enim facere magnam quos magnam distinctio.
Voluptate aliquam et qui qui et sed possimus. Explicabo aut cumque adipisci quod. Quisquam rerum numquam eligendi adipisci. Consequatur cum unde velit tempora et. Est quia sed totam consequatur. Occaecati totam quis velit voluptatem consequuntur qui.
Dolores id et et esse aut voluptas autem. Vitae modi dolores dolores veritatis nemo. Autem quaerat veritatis autem sit. Nobis velit est ducimus ea sed voluptate. Aut laborum sint dolore rerum odit distinctio officiis cupiditate.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...