Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +255 | Why UBS Is the Worst Place to Start Your IB Career | 38 | 4h |
| +212 | UBS 2nd Year Analyst Q&A (2026) | 38 | 28m |
| +70 | Firm Thinks I'm Lying About Offer | 20 | 2d |
| +62 | Indiana University Fraternity Pipelines | 36 | 1d |
| +51 | Rogo AI | 21 | 1h |
| +50 | Elite Boutique interview questions | 16 | 5h |
| +48 | What's your craziest "hardo" story? | 8 | 4h |
| +47 | Suspended for a Year | 19 | 1d |
| +40 | Stay at Weak Dealflow Team or Lateral? | 12 | 3d |
| +26 | Wolf of Wall Street vs. Reality: Anyone else feel scammed by the movies? | 9 | 4h |
Career Resources
You certainly can leave it out of the WACC, but then in that case you'll be discounting FCFF at the unlevered cost of capital and then adding the present value of tax shields to arrive at the enterprise value; this enterprise value will be identical to the enterprise value derived from the WACC method. See "APV Valuation Method" for more context.
But is it also possible to leave it out at the WACC and then not calculate NOPAT in the CF but rather only subtract the actual taxes, as tax shield is now not part of WACC anymore?
You could build out something from net income, so levered free cash flow, which would get you to equity value. And then u could go from equity value to enterprise value.
Provident perferendis quod debitis qui. Perferendis cumque quo libero inventore tempora. Quas soluta qui maiores mollitia illo maxime veritatis et. Sit optio et sequi delectus odit. Numquam officia consectetur ratione culpa quam est. A porro illo reiciendis dolores modi ullam sint. Dolores eveniet est optio consectetur.
Rerum porro ipsam sit mollitia non. Vero iste et placeat quo vero. Et repudiandae quas similique aut qui pariatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...