Realized how much harder recruiting is if you are an Asian/Indian male than anything else

If your name is similar to Raj Patel or Eric Zhang its such an uphill battle you've got to be Ivy or at the minimum some very good school like Vandy, Emory, UNC, UVA. Not to mention even those schools are very hard to get into if you're an ORM my high school's Indian salutatorian was rejected from Emory ED. If you're diversity URM or a woman then you're set up through the diversity programs. White males have it pretty hard too but most of finance is white male and Chad Smith is either very well connected or at the bare minimum has a cultural advantage. I will concede that its still difficult for a completely unconnected white male. Now many will counter what I'm saying by claiming that many people still break in. That's because we're GOATED like that. Nobody grinds as hard. However, its undeniable that the bar is so much higher. 


 

Actually so facts. Asian Americans have far fewer family connections compared to everyone else. I know white women with incredibly strong family connections within banks that get the diversity candidate benefits that Asian men with no exposure growing up get. We’re just expected to grind so much harder.

 
Most Helpful

Full time analyst at a BB and I e seen firsthand how fucked up diversity recruiting is. I've observed a material difference in school prestige and overall technical competency btwn diversity hires and non diversity hires.

Most non-diverse hires are your typical Ivy 3.9 gpa, president of every club on campus, networking hardo, and grind wso / BIWS technical guides every waking moment of life.

The diversity hires, kid you not, that I've seen have like a 3.4 gpa from fucking Ohio state with no fucking understanding of modeling or corporate finance ( some girl didn't know what a DCF was).

Even when you manage to get a SA offer, the bar for a FT return offer is also much higher for non-diverse hires as well

 
Funniest

I fucking work with that chick from Ohio State.

 

Full time analyst at a BB and I e seen firsthand how fucked up diversity recruiting is. I've observed a material difference in school prestige and overall technical competency btwn diversity hires and non diversity hires.

Most non-diverse hires are your typical Ivy 3.9 gpa, president of every club on campus, networking hardo, and grind wso / BIWS technical guides every waking moment of life.

The diversity hires, kid you not, that I've seen have like a 3.4 gpa from fucking Ohio state with no fucking understanding of modeling or corporate finance ( some girl didn't know what a DCF was).

Even when you manage to get a SA offer, the bar for a FT return offer is also much higher for non-diverse hires as well

When analyst classes get smaller (recession) they’ll hire less non targets - women hires won’t be coming from Ohio state anymore thankfully 

 

It's just like affirmative action - if you're black / latino / native american / etc. you benefit from diversity programs, but get shafted if you're Asian or Indian. With affirmative action, not only is there no benefit to being an Asian or Indian applicant, it's actually harder to get in. Which I mean totally makes sense to penalize another minority, but what do I know.

 

Your profile is probably just Mid. I've taken networking calls with plenty of Asian students. Clear difference between Asian students from targets vs. non-targets. Most of the non-target Asian students try to overhaul on internships and the recruiting process. Which results in a complete lack of personality and authenticity. Could also be a cultural difference. Honestly, have been unimpressed by most Asian students compared to other groups. Outside of the Ivy's, it's a cliff dive in terms of talent. Just a personal observation.

 

Lol. Tbf tho banking is filled with hardos who jack off to 10ks and some bs models

 

Agree that ultimately a blend of social and hardo is required. But Asian/Indian boys have to be hardos cuz the bar is much harder than typical candidates (excluding white males who also have no family connections). They have no choice but to embrace the grind. Meanwhile current analysts just flirt with women diversity candidates during campus presentations and networking calls. Systems fucked many banks have very little Asian/Indian representation. and there’s no way that can be explained proportionately by the stereotype that all Asian/Indian candidates lack social skills cuz that’s just bullshit. Sure some aren’t the most social but that’s most definitely not all. Almost racist of you to generalize them like that.

 

I actually have a couple of offers and my profile is not mid by any stretch. Ivy, Econ+Math minor in CS, 3.9, 3 internships, and president of 2 major clubs. I have just made these observations going through the recruiting process myself and seeing those around me.

 

Many Asian kids at non-Ivies would have probably been Ivy students if they were anything else

 

Definitely some Asians that are complete hardos and do nothing other than school, clubs, IB recruitment, etc. I don’t really hold that against them. I respect the grind and understand the pressure they’re under for near perfection. The attitude of “shit on someone for trying / putting a lot of effort into something” was really cool 40 years ago though.

Just because someone works hard doesn’t automatically mean they don’t have social skills, but yeah they won’t be talking about their 3 times a week commitments of pickle ball and sweet green.

 

It’s an uphill battle fs. Still nothing would stop us from climbing up the ladder. To all my brothers(non-diverse no-family connection asians/Indians & crackers) who made it, congratfucktulations, you totally deserve your spot and you are him.

 

Gotta give some more love to the brown/Asian boys tryna network out here

 

Worst of both worlds fr. Just to give my brothers some hope tho - u can still do it even without an elite background/perfect stats. I did. I have a 3.5 from an unprestigious school and I'm starting FT at a BB this summer. The trick is not necessarily to grind harder cuz every Asian does that. Best strategy is not to be the smartest, be the most interesting. Go against the stereotype and show them ur not a robot (some of these comments prove my point). Join some cool nonprofits, have hobbies in the "interests" section of ur resume that nobody else does. Go out of your way in your interviews to show that you're sociable and have a sense of humor. Don't be afraid to be casual with ur interviewers, crack a few jokes (within reason of course). Biggest thing I've seen holding back some Asians is they don't pass the airport test/beer test even if great on paper. A white guy might be able to get away with just saying "oh cool we both played lax in high school," or "hey did u see the warriors game this weekend" blah blah but that's not gonna cut it for u unfortunately. U want to have something that makes people say "wow that's actually cool as fuck". Instead of spending your time raising your gpa from a 3.8 to a 3.9 or learning how to do a paper LBO in your sleep, invest in developing your soft skills and doing something that makes u truly stand out. Easier said than done of course - still an uphill battle with plenty of luck involved. But for anyone who's discouraged, just know it can be done. Work smarter not harder.

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Is it possible that they’re referring to the term “American Indians?” As in, Native Americans, who are often listed as underrepresented minorities in diversity recruiting.

 

Absolutely not lol. Indians are literally the wealthiest minority in America by far and there’s a shit ton of over representation of Indians in all elite sectors medicine, finance, consulting, tech even politics I believe that 2 of the Republican candidates are Indian. There was literally something that blew up on this forum on an Indian kid faking being black to get into PWP

 

Pretty absurd considering many Indians have complexions way darker than black people, and by the same token face way worse treatment in society.

 

I can't wait until the world becomes a multi-polar world and the West finally loses it's monopoly on financial services and actually has to bring back some degree of meritocracy to compete. Let's do away with all this BS fakery already.

 

the issue is that the smartest Chinese/Indians prefer to be employees in US soil instead of building something in their country.

The fault is theirs for not building and developing their local businesses that could compete with the West. 

Because of that, next generations end up in the same place as theirs: Lack of local attractive corporations --> need to work for foreign corporations. 
China may outcompete US in the following decades, so maybe Americans will end up in the same position as Chinese/Indians competing for US banks. You never know.

 
Controversial

I don't get the point. US corporations prefer THEIR locals, meanwhile Indian/Chinese corporation prefer THEIR locals. maybe you're young/naive to see that, but no corporation really cares about globalization/diversity/foreigners unless it helps the business grow/uplift reputation

so why don't recruit for your local corporations where you have an advantage in terms of fitting in with clients, sharing common backgrounds, mindset, etc.?

I don't see any advantage in having extra Indians/Chinese in a banking team. I may raise the % of those hires only if a) they have connections back in their country that may help my business / b) I'm planning to expand into their countries or / c) I'm building rockets and I need the smartest people out there no matter their nationality (won't happen).

As long as we have around 10-15% diversity hires in the team, that's enough to have some foreign languages covered and some different perspectives.

if you were an executive in China/India, would you recruit extremely talented people from Nigeria/Senegal/Camerun assuming they know the local language when your business is 90% aimed towards helping local companies? clearly 0% benefits imo

you're only frustrated because this recruitment mindset sabotages your interests, but business-wise it's the most plausible way to build a business long-term,

that's why I like to tell people that if you can't help a business improve or provide value, you'll be endlessly fighting with thousands of candidates that don't differentiate as much from you.

that's a reality about globalization that you don't learn in school/college because it's not politically correct

 
I Beg To Differ

I don't get the point. US corporations prefer THEIR locals, meanwhile Indian/Chinese corporation prefer THEIR locals. maybe you're young/naive to see that, but no corporation really cares about globalization/diversity/foreigners unless it helps the business grow/uplift reputation

so why don't recruit for your local corporations where you have an advantage in terms of fitting in with clients, sharing common backgrounds, mindset, etc.?

I don't see any advantage in having extra Indians/Chinese in a banking team. I may raise the % of those hires only if a) they have connections back in their country that may help my business / b) I'm planning to expand into their countries or / c) I'm building rockets and I need the smartest people out there no matter their nationality (won't happen).

As long as we have around 10-15% diversity hires in the team, that's enough to have some foreign languages covered and some different perspectives.

if you were an executive in China/India, would you recruit extremely talented people from Nigeria/Senegal/Camerun assuming they know the local language when your business is 90% aimed towards helping local companies? clearly 0% benefits imo

you're only frustrated because this recruitment mindset sabotages your interests, but business-wise it's the most plausible way to build a business long-term,

that's why I like to tell people that if you can't help a business improve or provide value, you'll be endlessly fighting with thousands of candidates that don't differentiate as much from you.

that's a reality about globalization that you don't learn in school/college because it's not politically correct

To be "their local" in the US you need European ancestors ok got it thanks !

 

What's worse is that I've found East Asian men (I am one myself) to be BY FAR the WORST in terms of responding to my cold networking outreach. This is NOT true for East Asian women for whatever reason. Perhaps it's because East Asian men see each other as their competition in a cutthroat industry... perhaps they want to be distanced from their ethnicity... I have never gotten a single response from any of my cold networking emails to East Asian men, despite my response rate being quite good for every other ethnicity and even East Asian women. Not even my school's East Asian male alumni respond to me. I don't understand the complete inverse of racial solidarity. 

 

Dolores hic eum aliquid non ad accusantium. Illo in error in qui facere totam aliquam. Praesentium facilis nam fugit adipisci pariatur reiciendis. Fugit quam commodi assumenda veniam est reprehenderit.

 

Et dolor error rerum iste natus. At vitae enim vel non provident enim adipisci ducimus. Enim ea quia perferendis voluptatem voluptates qui. Qui velit magnam et.

Accusantium modi non dolorem soluta at consequatur. Minus voluptatibus ut rerum. Molestiae ea eaque rerum. Ut quia sapiente eveniet cum possimus ipsa. Voluptate eligendi cupiditate ab sit et.

Qui at ea aperiam et molestias molestiae et. Quasi et officia debitis corrupti magnam quam. Suscipit et molestiae tempore deserunt.

Perferendis recusandae est delectus similique. Quis placeat sint nobis iste ut. Assumenda minus voluptatem autem et.

 

Quia earum ipsa rerum. Quibusdam nulla doloribus porro alias ratione. Sit mollitia ipsum aut in cumque consequatur.

Est aut et eum culpa molestiae aliquam. Voluptas et excepturi pariatur at dolorem laboriosam distinctio. Est nam qui est provident omnis exercitationem iusto. Unde optio cum recusandae eligendi nostrum qui rem.

Fugiat sunt quo dolorem laudantium porro consequuntur. Id occaecati quia numquam consequatur. Et aut enim possimus itaque fuga aut similique. Aliquid vero quam ipsam magni nulla ea. Voluptate magnam reprehenderit dolorum ducimus minus.

Mollitia quibusdam est officia eligendi necessitatibus corrupti. Corrupti sunt rerum veniam consequatur nemo ex. Sit corporis voluptas ipsa ratione possimus harum voluptatum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”