SA Recruiting Timelines are R*tarded

Each year it is the same thing: Bank A wants to be the first to open their applications so they launch their apps ~2-3 weeks earlier than the prior year. As a result, Banks B,C,D,E... panic and follow suit to "not miss out on top talent".

This all snowballed into what we have today with SA 2027 Applications opening at the beginning of December.

The system is ridiculous and having people apply then interview for jobs that are ~18 months away is idiotic for many reasons. No one can predict where they'll be at 18 months from now (personally, professionally, interest wise, etc.) and with all the changes in technology, AI, etc. banks have zero grasp of headcount requirements for 2027.

Not going to make this a long rant but just think inherently the increased timelines have more negatives than positives. Would just be curious on what others on the banking side of the world (not prospects / interns) think about this.

Best of luck to all the prospects playing lottery right now with applications and having to prep for / potentially have interviews during the holidays.

15 Comments
 

I think it stops at Junior year SA apps targeting freshmen.  As a non-target student, it's honestly amazing at how much some of these schools lag behind targets and semi-targets when it comes to any sort of prep for high finance, whether that be IB, PE, HF, S&T, ER

Currently, there are way more applicants than there are open seats. My guess is that it won't change. 

Writing
 

Based on the most insightful WSO threads, your frustration with the accelerated SA recruiting timelines is a sentiment shared by many in the industry. The "race to the bottom" dynamic, where banks push their timelines earlier each year to secure top talent, has indeed created a system that feels rushed and inefficient for both candidates and firms. Here are some key points to consider:

  1. Timeline Creep: The trend of applications opening earlier each year is driven by competition among banks. No one wants to be late to the party and risk losing top candidates, but this has led to a system where students are forced to make career decisions far too early, often before they've had time to explore their interests or develop relevant skills.

  2. Uncertainty for Candidates: As you pointed out, applying for roles 18 months in advance is challenging. Students may not know their long-term goals, and their interests or circumstances could change significantly during that time. This creates unnecessary stress and forces premature decision-making.

  3. Bank Challenges: From the banks' perspective, predicting headcount needs so far in advance is equally problematic. Economic conditions, market trends, and internal changes can all impact hiring needs, making it difficult to plan effectively.

  4. Impact on Diversity and Inclusion: Accelerated timelines can disproportionately disadvantage candidates from non-traditional backgrounds or those without early access to resources and networks. These candidates may not be as prepared to navigate the process on such a tight schedule.

  5. Holiday Stress: The overlap of recruiting with the holiday season adds another layer of pressure for candidates, who must balance family time, academic responsibilities, and interview preparation.

While the system has its flaws, it's unlikely to change without a collective effort from banks to standardize timelines. Until then, candidates should focus on early preparation, networking, and leveraging resources like WSO's guides and mock interviews to stay competitive.

For prospects navigating this chaotic process, remember: preparation and persistence are key. And for those on the banking side, perhaps it's time to advocate for a more balanced and thoughtful approach to recruiting.

Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/will-2020-recruiting-ft-and-sa-be-accelerated-or-be-more-relaxed?customgpt=1, SA and Full Time Recruiting 2020 thread, How to Approach 2020 SA Recruiting as a Junior Transfer to a Target, SA Recruiting and Game Theory

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

RBC (first bank to open) actually opened earlier last year, most banks that open Sep-Dec don't start interviewing until Jan 1st onwards

Still believe timelines are insanely ridiculous and should be pushed back as it breeds more socially inept hardos that don't have time to actual socialize before drowing themselves on excel every night

 

It's just dumbass game theory where companies think they're getting better talent. There will probably be a correction like PE on-cycle recruiting, it's idiotic to be taking networking calls and spam refreshing Trackr 20x a day to land an internship in 2 year's time.

 

Wholeheartedly agree - I actually see more benefits to doing it like MBA recruiting where you're interviewing in November / December for internships that start the next summer (not ~2 years out).

Similarly to On-Cycle PE recruiting happening before people actually have real FT experience, I think you'd be able to better gauge who is most qualified. Going back to the PE example - you'd be able to tell who has the real skills & experience vs those faking it until they make it (i.e. if On-Cycle took the same approach as MBA recruiting, the "strong" or best applicants would have true deal experience & strong reviews to back them vs just memorizing technicals & LBO templates).

Just my 2 cents.

 

Totally agree. Also sweating this hard for an internship this early absolutely sucks for new kids, especially when they have to grind so hard for a fucking internship that they might realize they don't want after having to wait almost two years to begin it. Do you know how much can change in two fucking years??? I feel so sorry for the next generation of finance and they're only a couple years younger than I am. Can't wait to see 2029 SA positions open up in january lololol

 

for the econ majors out there, this is market unraveling on full display, same with on-cycle. the only real way that this has been stopped in the past (ex. residency matching) is through a centralized system that sets the timeline. probably, schools will have to get involved, but then you would need complete participation because any school not regulating would cause all schools to stop (or those that care about banking). or banks have to realize that the quality of kids their getting is meaningfully lower, but again that’s not gonna happen likely because pretty much anyone can do an IB internship since there’s little knowledge barrier unlike engineering fields.

 
Most Helpful

This comes up every year, but at least looking at it from a student life perspective, I disagree with the sentiment here. 

The benefit of early finance recruiting for students is that once they’re done, they’re free. No stressing about employment for the rest of their time in college. My years as a college upperclassmen were some of the best of my life, in no small part because I could be totally carefree. I had no (professional) worries, problems, or stress at all. 

Comparing that to some of my friends who were in other fields, their latter years were far more stressful as they had to think about employment or further education.

Finance kids get the better side of the trade. 

Also, re: “changing your mind” in the intervening 18 months, it’s not like recruiting for finance closes any doors. If kids want to withdraw from internships they can … the majority don’t. It’s not a significant issue. 

 

Amet rem dignissimos exercitationem aliquam vel. Error iste est et ut rerum ex. Nulla dolor cumque dicta numquam.

Aut et ut debitis consectetur deserunt. Numquam nemo accusantium est qui nemo quibusdam provident iure. Et numquam maiores rerum aliquam aut.

Delectus maiores beatae tenetur soluta vero assumenda. Quisquam ut explicabo quia et. Rerum ipsam accusamus iste aut autem perspiciatis sunt. Vero iste soluta ad ducimus. Dolor odio nisi placeat molestiae totam. Iusto earum est voluptatem repudiandae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”