Starting in IB vs PC

I’m graduating soon and trying to decide between investment banking and private credit. I’d really appreciate some perspective.

I’ve interned in both venture capital and investment banking. Right now, I have an offer from a private credit firm with around $3B AUM that focuses on venture and growth-stage technology companies. The culture seems great, and I’d be doing real credit analysis as a business analyst. I also have some leads with smaller, but solid, boutique investment banks in the lower middle market.

I’m more drawn to the private credit role since it feels more interesting and aligned with how I think. Long term, I’d like to move into growth-stage equity investing, whether that’s VC/PE/hybrid fund, so I’m trying to make the right decision.

Some people I’ve spoken with say I should go into banking first since it "keeps more doors open" and I might get pigeonholed in private credit. Others think going PC buy-side early is a great opportunity to learn to think like an investor and build a strong network.

How real is the pigeonhole risk? Would starting in private credit make it harder to move into growth equity or similar investing roles later on? And how do people view the long-term career path in private credit? Any other things i should consider?

I truly appreciate any advice or thoughts from those with more experience, thank you.

7 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s a breakdown of your situation and the factors to consider:

1. Pigeonhole Risk in Private Credit

  • The risk of being pigeonholed in private credit is often overstated. Many WSO threads highlight that private credit professionals, especially those at reputable firms, can transition into growth equity, private equity, or even venture capital. The key is to focus on building transferable skills like financial modeling, credit analysis, and understanding capital structures.
  • A user in a WSO thread mentioned that private credit, particularly in a firm with a focus on venture and growth-stage companies, can provide a strong foundation for thinking like an investor. This aligns well with your long-term goal of moving into growth equity.

2. Investment Banking vs. Private Credit

  • Investment Banking: Starting in IB is often seen as the "traditional" path because it provides broad exposure to deal-making, financial modeling, and a strong network. It’s true that IB keeps more doors open, especially for roles in private equity or corporate development. However, the work can be more execution-focused and less investor-oriented compared to private credit.
  • Private Credit: Starting in private credit, especially at a firm with $3B AUM and a focus on venture/growth-stage companies, is a unique opportunity. You’ll gain direct exposure to credit analysis, deal structuring, and portfolio management, which are valuable skills for growth equity. Additionally, private credit roles often allow for earlier responsibility and a more investor-focused mindset.

3. Long-Term Career Path in Private Credit

  • Private credit offers a compelling long-term career path, particularly as institutional investors increasingly allocate to alternative credit strategies. According to WSO discussions, private credit professionals can achieve strong compensation and work-life balance, especially at senior levels.
  • However, if your ultimate goal is growth equity, you’ll need to ensure that your private credit experience aligns with that trajectory. Focus on deals involving growth-stage companies and build a network in the venture/PE ecosystem.

4. Key Considerations for Your Decision

  • Alignment with Interests: You mentioned being more drawn to private credit. If the role excites you and aligns with your strengths, that’s a strong indicator.
  • Firm Reputation and Deal Flow: The private credit firm’s focus on venture and growth-stage companies is a significant advantage. Ensure the firm has a strong reputation and deal flow to maximize your learning and networking opportunities.
  • Exit Opportunities: While IB may offer broader exit options, private credit can still lead to growth equity if you position yourself strategically. Highlight your experience with growth-stage companies and develop a narrative around your investor mindset.

5. Final Thoughts

  • If you’re genuinely more interested in private credit and the firm offers a strong platform, it could be the right choice. The skills and network you build there can still support a transition to growth equity later.
  • On the other hand, if you’re unsure about your long-term goals or want to maximize optionality, starting in IB might be safer.

Ultimately, the best choice depends on your interests, the specific opportunities at each firm, and how well they align with your long-term goals. Good luck!

Sources: Private Equity vs. Private Credit, Private Equity vs Megafund Credit, Private Equity vs. Venture Capital in 2018, Private Equity vs. Private Credit, Alternative Lenders & the End of Risk Taking for Banks - Opportunity or Risk?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Moving from credit > equity side is more challenging than the other way around. That said, if you are ok with moving to a more VC-style fund after (eg. not looking at Series C+), then may be ok to start on credit side. You’ll have good knowledge base of the sector and companies within the space, but won’t have the IB training experience some of the later stage shops would want.

My 2 cents is the PC role seems better than a no-name boutique IB. If you go IB route you may end up wasting 2+ years trying to lateral to a better brand name which is likely not optimal given your PC offer.

 

Was in a similar spot out of school, had return offers from a solid MM Investment bank and a 2bn mid-market focused PC fund (where I eventually started full time).

My perspective is that if you're agnostic between a long term career in IBD / PE / PC, you should pick the place where you can learn the most, not just from the deals you work on but also the people you're working with. You don't have to worry about being pigeonholed if you're young, hungry and eager enough. Optionality is overrated.



 

 

I would like to caveat that I was in a very different situation as I had done a few other internships in levfin / PC and I wanted to be in a role that was focused on credit. Also, I'm not based in the US. I decided on the PC fund as (1) I felt that I would learn more from people that are actually taking "principal" risk on deals, (2) really enjoyed working with the colleagues in the PC fund and (3) PC fund was focused on mid-market, which I feel is a lot more interesting than your typical sponsor backed BSL / Unitranche that I would have worked on at the bank.Personally, my experience has been really amazing and I have no regrets. I genuinely enjoy the work and the people I work with. The learning experience has been amazing given that my team is fairly lean. My learning has also been accelerated by the exposure I get from being lopped into the full investment life cycle from origination—>structuring–>  underwriting–>portfolio management.With regards to opportunities, my fund has a strong reputation among other credit shops and I get inbounds from recruiters all the time for roles at other credit funds. Obviously I'm never going to be competitive for a buyout role at BX / KKR / Apollo but that wasn't really my goal to begin with. 

My only advice if you will have it, is to just do all the diligence you need to do on the options and make the choice that feels right for you. In hindsight, I've made many bad decisions in my life but I don't beat myself up over then as I've always felt that I made the right decision at that point in time with the the information I had on hand. Good luck!  

 

Accusamus dolores officia ad. Voluptatibus vel quas rerum reprehenderit modi officiis qui. Voluptatem nesciunt quisquam rerum sed id voluptatem consectetur quia.

Qui dolores corporis modi et sapiente velit. Officia voluptatem aut dicta. Qui porro quod neque sit. Nemo blanditiis quos enim atque ab sit. Dicta aliquam similique voluptatem voluptas minima in vero.

In sit repudiandae facilis neque sint. Itaque unde facere et officiis. Dignissimos eos mollitia quasi sint ut vel soluta et. Accusamus sint sit ipsam voluptatum nobis sapiente dolor. Incidunt maiores ut ad fuga quia. Consequatur illo neque voluptatem iste est fuga. Qui soluta architecto quia quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”