Statutory tax rate in WACC

Can someone please explain as to why we use statutory tax rate (instead of the effective in the calculation for WACC?? One reason I could think of is that statutory is more normalized.

6 Comments
 
Best Response

I'm going to bump this because I came on to ask a similar question about WACC. A colleague of mine states that WACC is tax adjusted to account for the CAPM which is implicitly tax effected. I've always thought that the cost of debt was tax effected to account for tax benefits. If it is the former, then the reason we use say 39% is because we assume that the purchaser is gaining an incremental benefit from the company, that is to say that your company should be taxed at the rate of the next dollar earned. Lower tax rates in US firms are largely related to credits and foreign operations. If you can make the argument that your tax should be lower, then by all means run with it and get ready for battle on review.

 
jack_donaghyI'm going to bump this because I came on to ask a similar question about WACC. A colleague of mine states that WACC is tax adjusted to account for the CAPM which is implicitly tax effected. I've always thought that the cost of debt was tax effected to account for tax benefits.

It is always the cost of debt that is tax effected..to account for the interest tax shield.

Can anyone answer as to why we use effective tax rate for calculation of FCF whereas Statutory for calculation of WACC???

 

"In doing projections, it is far safer to use the marginal tax rate since the effective tax rate is really a reflection of the difference between the accounting and the tax books. By using the marginal tax rate, we tend to understate the after-tax operating income in the earlier years, but the after-tax tax operating income is more accurate in later years If you choose to use the effective tax rate, adjust the tax rate towards the marginal tax rate over time." (A. Damodaran)

I'm grateful that I have two middle fingers, I only wish I had more.
 

Sunt in recusandae minima omnis in officiis molestiae. Corporis quae nemo sint dolorem omnis et. Quo animi temporibus voluptates eum corporis.

Inventore et dolore laudantium. Dolor officia dolorem est deserunt sit. Ut magnam aut id velit dolorum. Animi qui rerum tempore eius mollitia.

Inventore debitis dicta sit. Hic amet ea dolorem. Soluta animi a perferendis sit dolor qui. Ut assumenda qui magni nostrum sit mollitia. Sed voluptatibus exercitationem ut enim voluptatem repellat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”